Should not be hard for you to find.
Google big Ron slaps CRT math books.
Should not be hard for you to find.
Google big Ron slaps CRT math books.
Drunk DarrinS is convinced these text books exist.
Shouldn't be that hard for you to link
"Florida CRT math textbook excerpt examples"
Where's the CRT in the books DeSantis banned? Why is he hiding the ball if it's so clear cut? In poker you have to show your cards, but in politics bald assertion seems to be good enough for you if it flatters your priors.
Last edited by Winehole23; 04-22-2022 at 08:58 AM.
There's no natural law that mandated anything being called eukaryotes or photosynthesis. These are just names given to items with clusters of similar characteristics, and the name given to specific processes. If you want to consider that naming to be a social construct, I don't have any issues with that. The problem is that CRT considers those similar characteristic clusters to be non existent as well. It goes to solipsism, and you went to solipsism and have been trying to fight your way back since. It's amazing what someone will do to avoid admitting they were wrong.
Bend over, I'll in' show you a bald insertion to flatten your priors
"DMC rodeo" then posts paragraphs in response
idiot
These two wouldn't walk through the ghetto if you paid them but they know the black experience
More gay fantasies, zero germane examples of what y'all are griping about in the banned math books.
Not sure you're using "contends" correctly here.
Gay is a sexual preference. When you bend over, it won't be about sex. It will be about power and control.
But show an example of me griping about the text books. Go ahead.
Looks like their beef is with empathy. SET
https://news.yahoo.com/florida-relea...120856056.html
That and the very thought that racism exists.
Seems like saying racism exists is not politically correct.
who benefits most from saying racism doesn't exist? hmmmmmm
"it's just numbers.. lol banning numbers" -Blake
I said y'all, not you. For someone so hung up on semantics you sure are dense.
so you did take sides and you are griping.
hope nobody got whiplash, you were playing coy a couple of posts back.
Btw, can you link us to your source for that? What's the book?
This is what has all the snowflakes melting? smh
I decided to put my two quarters in the machine and take a spin for /giggles. You gonna respond or cower away under the guise of "me lol u"
Have you walked through the ghetto?
They should have just stuck with bias.
And of course almost everyone is going to show some sort of bias, especially if the questions are designed to show it. The real problem with these sorts of tests are the questions.
The point is really we all show different types of biases, especially based on the type of people we grow up around and are considered "normal" to us. I mean a kid who has never seen a black or white person will immediately notice a different in pigmentation, facial features, hair texture, if it is well outside their experience and they will let you know it. Its what happens after this that is important. How do you react to people after being exposed to differences you have never seen before.
Your example on two old white people who study these types of things walking into a black ghetto is ridiculous. I could drive two black people right now to places in South Texas where the same sort of reactions would occur. And they are going to get more violent with the type of poverty the people in those places live in. Its just ridiculous to refuse to admit that cultural and physical differences between two groups of people do not illicit hateful reactions on some occasions. And of course blacks get the most of it simply because there are more white people to see a possible concern and history in this country. This does not only happen in the US. Communities that are separated and show a good deal of difference in experience and ability to navigate in that country both socially and economically are more likely to have "race" problems. And it goes with all skin colors and cultures. Its drastic between Indians and Blacks in Trinidad and Tobago and Cambridge Analytica used it as a testing ground in elections.
What exactly is the surprise here for you?
nope. does CRT claim that skin colors do not exist?
no it doesnt. i never went the solipsism. you're the one who keeps bringing it up. claiming things are social constructs doesnt mean that nothing can be known. you can keep trying to shoehorn this as many times as you want, its not going to workIt goes to solipsism, and you went to solipsism and have been trying to fight your way back since. It's amazing what someone will do to avoid admitting they were wrong.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)