COVID-19: Official PLANDEMIC Thread

[ElNono]

When you have disavowed WaPo and NYT for their fake news, I'll take you seriously maybe.
Right now, this is all just posturing and the convenience you need.

You're not seriously comparing gab with the NYTimes and WaPo, right?

I mean, I don't even post much from, nor read either, but the fact that they have at the very least editorial standards is simply miles, miles better than the pile of unfiltered doodoo coming from the likes of MrTrumpFan on gab (and you can extend that to probably about half of twitter as well).

[ElNono]

Boom.

https://gab.com/ChesterBelloc/posts/106144755129497031

I looked, probably last time ever.

"I haven't fact checked this"
links to an actual news article that reads:

Before eventually leaving, some protesters held an impromptu unofficial election, selecting their own board that voted to rescind the mask policies, the Arizona Daily Star reported.

fake election
fake news
boom

[Spurtacular]

I looked, probably last time ever.

"I haven't fact checked this"
links to an actual news article that reads:

Before eventually leaving, some protesters held an impromptu unofficial election, selecting their own board that voted to rescind the mask policies, the Arizona Daily Star reported.

fake election
fake news
boom

So you're mad that the person is upfront about hearsay? K

It links an article as well.

I think you're mad that the people are attempting to take back power. Stuff like that will never suit you.

[Spurtacular]

You're not seriously comparing gab with the NYTimes and WaPo, right?

I mean, I don't even post much from, nor read either, but the fact that they have at the very least editorial standards is simply miles, miles better than the pile of unfiltered doodoo coming from the likes of MrTrumpFan on gab (and you can extend that to probably about half of twitter as well).

I would put Gab way above those two. It's organic. It's not driven by corrupt forces. There is no censorship like with big tech either.
You're scared of a world not controlled by your overlords.

[Spurtacular]

ElNono

Go ahead and post an article that refutes this if you got one.
But this is what is being said.

[ElNono]

So you're mad that the person is upfront about hearsay? K

It links an article as well.

I think you're mad that the people are attempting to take back power. Stuff like that will never suit you.

Why did you post Boom?

You keep falling for fake news... why do you post fake news, derp? It's a waste of everybody's time.

[ElNono]

I would put Gab way above those two. It's organic. It's not driven by corrupt forces. There is no censorship like with big tech either.
You're scared of a world not controlled by your overlords.

of course you would. That says more about you than those two. Like way more, and I'm not even a reader of either.
more conspiracies.

[ElNono]

ElNono

Go ahead and post an article that refutes this if you got one.
But this is what is being said.

It was linked on the previous gab post you clearly didn't read

https://ktar.com/story/4361993/arizo...-mask-mandate/

Do you on your living room on the regular too? Why do you keep taking s here?

[Spurtacular]

It was linked on the previous gab post you clearly didn't read

https://ktar.com/story/4361993/arizo...-mask-mandate/

Do you on your living room on the regular too? Why do you keep taking s here?

I looked at it. No mention of whether the action is legit or not in that article.

Again, if you have an article that says it isn't, then list it.

And stop playing the clearly you didn't read card like a (chumpette) when there's nothing clear about that.

[Spurtacular]

of course you would. That says more about you than those two. Like way more, and I'm not even a reader of either.
more conspiracies.

This isn't being turned on me, dude.
NYT said Trump followers killed a police man on January 6th.
That's not new reporting; that straight-up phony propaganda.
THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT.
You're trying to hold random gab posters to a high level when you won't even hold multi billion dollar news agencies to any standard.
YOUR JUST GOT KICKED IN.

[ElNono]

I looked at it. No mention of whether the action is legit or not in that article.

Before eventually leaving, some protesters held an impromptu unofficial election, selecting their own board that voted to rescind the mask policies, the Arizona Daily Star reported.

Now look up unofficial on the dictionary.

[ElNono]

Not to mention that the "Boom" you posted said:

The Board was overwhelmed and outnumbered. They quit.

which is entirely a falsehood. The board adjourned and cancelled the meeting.

[Spurtacular]

Before eventually leaving, some protesters held an impromptu unofficial election, selecting their own board that voted to rescind the mask policies, the Arizona Daily Star reported.

Now look up unofficial on the dictionary.

But no actual refutation of the meeting based on bylaws?
Just 'trust us, this doesn't count.'
K

Sorry, but that's ty journalism.

[Spurtacular]

Not to mention that the "Boom" you posted said:

The Board was overwhelmed and outnumbered. They quit.

which is entirely a falsehood. The board adjourned and cancelled the meeting.

The boom is based on the people being that fed up. It absolutely applies.

[pgardn]

This isn't being turned on me, dude.
NYT said Trump followers killed a police man on January 6th.
That's not new reporting; that straight-up phony propaganda.
THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT.
You're trying to hold random gab posters to a high level when you won't even hold multi billion dollar news agencies to any standard.
YOU'RE JUST GOT KICKED IN.

You just dont look very hard big Font derp.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...146_story.html

Now continue with your story or stories.
got a retraction from random dude living in a basement yet?

[ElNono]

But no actual refutation of the meeting based on bylaws?
Just 'trust us, this doesn't count.'
K

Sorry, but that's ty journalism.

What bylaws are you talking about? Post them. Again, you're taking the word of randos on the internet lying straight to your face over and over vs actual news.

That's exactly why journalistic standards matter. You'll never see a retraction from dummy on gab when they slap you left and right with fake news.

[Spurtacular]

What bylaws are you talking about? Post them. Again, you're taking the word of randos on the internet lying straight to your face over and over vs actual news.

That's exactly why journalistic standards matter. You'll never see a retraction from dummy on gab when they slap you left and right with fake news.

I'm not writing the article. If they can't find them, then just say so. You can't call it "unofficial" just because.

[ElNono]

I'm not writing the article. If they can't find them, then just say so. You can't call it "unofficial" just because.

You sure as are claiming the article is wrong with zero evidence to back it up. Sorry, you and gab s not more credible than a news agency.

[Spurtacular]

You sure as are claiming the article is wrong with zero evidence to back it up. Sorry, you and gab s not more credible than a news agency.

Quote that.

In fact, I believe the article is likely correct in that aspect.
I've called out the deficiency in reporting rigor, and you are (conveniently) confusing the issue.

[Spurtacular]

[ElNono]

Quote that.

ok

But no actual refutation of the meeting based on bylaws?
Just 'trust us, this doesn't count.'

there you go.

[Spurtacular]

ok



there you go.

There I go, what? I've called out the lack of rigor. I've made no claim that they're wrong.
Maybe you're just below average intelligence to not understand that.

[ElNono]

There I go, what? I've called out the lack of rigor. I've made no claim that they're wrong.
Maybe you're just below average intelligence to not understand that.

You said right afterwards that they can't call it unofficial, which means you're implying they're lying.

here:

I'm not writing the article. If they can't find them, then just say so. You can't call it "unofficial" just because.

Despite that the article clearly states the board didn't quit (as opposed to gab ), they merely adjourned and cancelled, so there's nothing to vote for, which implicitly makes the vote indeed unofficial.

Hopefully that's clear enough for you to understand now...

[Spurtacular]

You said right afterwards that they can't call it unofficial, which means you're implying they're lying.

here:


Despite that the article clearly states the board didn't quit (as opposed to gab ), they merely adjourned and cancelled, so there's nothing to vote for, which implicitly makes the vote indeed unofficial.

Hopefully that's clear enough for you to understand now...

Yes, they can't call it unofficial just because. They lacked rigor in stating the claim.
Some townships have less formal rules than others. They did not cite a reason for it being "unofficial".
That's not me stating the claim is wrong. That's me saying the claim is unsubstantiated.
Maybe you're below average intelligence to not get something so simple.
Hopefully that's clear enough for you to understand now...

[ChumpDumper]

This isn't being turned on me, dude.
NYT said Trump followers killed a police man on January 6th.
That's not new reporting; that straight-up phony propaganda.
THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT.
You're trying to hold random gab posters to a high level when you won't even hold multi billion dollar news agencies to any standard.
YOU'RE JUST GOT KICKED IN.

*your