Don't care about your link. Try to make sense.
Don't care about your link. Try to make sense.
So 5.6mm?
Leave it to a former Air Force lab tech to post 5.6mm!
Sounds good. Break down how a van kill more people in this situation than a 5.6 MM caliber AR-10
Because it doesn't exist in AR10.
86 people were killed by a van in Paris. That beats every mass killing in the US using a rifle by at least a dozen.
There are ways to kill a lot of people that don't need to include firearms. This doesn't mean the firearm isn't made to kill things.
Last edited by DMC; 06-12-2022 at 11:03 AM.
I think that was me. It’s called Threat Neutralization Training. I think.
It’s pretty easy to equip a van with a dirty bomb and then also load it up with fertilizer. Also maybe have a drone launch pad on the roof.
OKC bombing never happened.
In 2020 more than 38 k people were killed in car related accidents. Meanwhile there were less than 20 k gun related deaths in the same year. Why politicians are ignoring the obvious? Government should make background checks mandatory before allowing someone buy a potentially deadly weapon on wheels.
A large mass of people in the street/sidewalk area? The van was even driving slowly, so why couldn't people just jump out of the way?
How many do you think the guy could have killed if he had used to the most efficient legal gun on the market in that situation? Be honest, broker.
If it's that easy, why bother with an AR-15? Why haven't we had more Oklahoma City type bombings since 1995?
Last edited by Blake; 06-12-2022 at 01:09 PM.
At least they got the ball rolling...
Senate group agrees on broad outline of new gun law after Uvalde massacre.
Among other provisions, the agreement would provide funding for mental health, incentives for the creation of so-called "red flag" laws to remove firearms from people who are a danger to themselves or others, increase money for school safety and strengthen the federal background check system as it relates to convicted domestic violence abusers or those with restraining orders.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sena...gun-law-uvalde
Even before the attacks last week in Spain, European cities were installing barriers to protect pedestrians after a series of attacks using cars, vans and trucks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/22/w...-barriers.html
Sounds like the right plan.
Lol ducks
Tell yourself this.
"A knife could cause the same damage in the Uvalde situation"
This is sense for DMC... So I should try and make sense?
Uhuh...
DMC - "I am not the general public. I can produce M5 knockoffs. These are not sold to the general public. "
and....
THE HONEST BROKER!
Here’s where Dirks_Finale hides from the thread
That’s literally all of their mindsets here, not just his
*Post something stupid
*Lib replies “that’s stupid”
”HAHAHA GOTHEEEEEEM”
Probably because fertilizer prices are so high.
ing Boomers!
Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper says that former President Trump asked authorities if they could shoot protesters in the legs amid the demonstrations that filled the streets of Washington following the murder of George Floyd.
“Can’t you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?” Esper says Trump said.
Also Biden is a ing re not to know anything about guns but speak on them as if the cops have 110% accuracy in hitting a ing limb vs center mass. You ing gun pussies are all the same weak s.
The van wasn't required to drive slowly. If the guy wasn't intending to kill people, then the same guy with an AR15 also wouldn't be intending to kill people. If he was, and was that stupid to drive slowly, then he'd not be able to get the AR loaded and chambered.
How many do you think he would have killed if he had used the fastest, most robust van or truck in existence?
Nope, question pending.
“Can’t you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?” Esper says Trump said.
And god bless.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)