Reply With Quote
He's basically to the right of Biden on almost everything but guns.
He's basically to the right of Biden on almost everything but guns.
polling 1% last I heard
That's accurate.
Like a number of billionaire heads out there, the ME TOO backlash could be considerable. Already has been, imho.
You would hope 30 million in ads for a weekend would buy you at least that.
This mother er is already everywhere on TV here.
He's the byproduct of a extremely weak Democratic field. Both on ideas and appeal.
Needs some polishing himself, it would seem:
Trash is the byproduct of a extremely weak Repug field. Both on ideas and appeal.
More younger people need to start running. Young as an 45...50. The current crop of candidates average age is 75.
Inept Mikey has no chance. But if by some miracle your fellow commies nominate him, I'll take it. He'll lose the presidency based on these two minutes alone.
Was Hillary and the Dem field extremely weak?
Look, I agree it's damning, but I've also learned than in these races, it's all relative. If you can survive grab em by the pussy, you can certainly survive that.
And let's be honest here for a second, he's a miles better candidate than Biden.
These rich guys can't stand any criticism or back chat.With Michael Bloomberg now running for president, the news service that bears his name said Sunday it will not “investigate” him or any of his Democratic rivals, and Bloomberg Opinion will no longer run unsigned editorials
I believe that norm has been broken.The entry of Bloomberg into the presidential race also raises potential conflict-of-interest questions involving his extensive business holdings, which go well beyond his news service. Bloomberg’s businesses, which include selling financial data services, employ more than 19,000 people in 69 countries.
Experts say those holdings could create financial conflicts stemming from Bloomberg’s policy positions, both domestic and foreign, unless he takes decisive action to formally remove himself from his businesses.
“We want people to have confidence that folks in government, including the president, are acting out of a sense of concern for the public interest, not the vision of what their private interests are,” said Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis who focuses on legal and government ethics.
Olly olly oxen free.
These rich elites can’t stand being outdone. They just have to try and buy their way into everything.
I give Trump props in this respect. He knew where he needed to run and how to do it. Guy has the Chrises, ducks and TSAs of this world on their knees.
Yea, playboy or commie dictator denier. What's the diff, amirite?
What's with you and trannies on every post, that's creepy weird.
and why are you so mad? You know just as well as I do that it's a popularity contest, nothing more, nothing less.
Unlike you with Dear Leader, I'm not trying to excuse what he said, at all. The point is that the bar has suddenly become so low for all these media 'bombs s', that's difficult to tell anymore what's really damning and what's not.
Laugh it up all you want, but that pussy comment would've ended most politicians careers not long ago, especially coming from the candidate of a party full of evangelicals, that preaches the 'sanc y of family', 'abstinence' and all that moral high horse idiocy.
The new King Cyrus
Spurtacular is all here for the trannyfication.
bump
Bill Clinton was sexually assaulting one woman after another while his wife protected him. Stop your crying.
how you like Mike now?
There is so much out there on the Clintons. But you're crying snowflake tears about locker room talk.
You're confusing an alleged defense of Clinton, of which there's none here, with the claim that was made: that 'locker room talk', as you like to call it, would've ended many politicos careers.There is so much out there on the Clintons. But you're crying snowflake tears about locker room talk.
Heck, Clinton did put his presidency on the line over a blowjob, and I'm fairly sure your outrage about it was pretty real.
Ultimately, you're trying to make this about whataboutism. It isn't.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
