100Ks of EVIDENCE rape kits unprocessed nationwide
Toxic male law enforcement doesn't take women and rape seriously.
Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow.Senior Republican staffers also learned of the allegation last week and, in conversations with The New Yorker, expressed concern about its potential impact on Kavanaugh’s nomination. Soon after, Senate Republicans issued renewed calls to accelerate the timing of a committee vote.
you seem to have an axe to grind with women who disclose past sexual assaults. maybe you should reflect on why that is.
I am speaking of highly politicized investigations where either side have interest in. You don't think there was anything wrong with the immunity handed out to Hillary people, to the smashing of cel phones and bleach bitting of computers, the writing exoneration letter before subject was interviewed?
He hates women because Bernie wasn't actually a Democrat or something.
makes sense
*ding*
Michael Avenatti Has Multiple Witnesses That
Brett Kavanaugh Participated In Gang Rapes
Attorney Michael Avenatti has multiple witnesses willing to testify that Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge participated in the drugging and gang raping of women at DC house parties in the 1980s.
Avenatti released his email to Mike Davis, Chief Counsel for Nominations for U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary which gave details on the new allegations:
<email image>
it is about to get so much worse for Republicans.
The new witnesses should be enough to sink Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination. If any of these gang rapes happened in Maryland, that state has no statute of limitations on rape and sexual assault.
This is information that must be delivered to the American people. Any other victims, witnesses, or representatives of these individuals can not sit by and let Chuck Grassley and the Republican men on the Senate Judiciary Committee push through the nomination of a potential sexual predator to the Supreme Court.
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/09...iticus+USA+%29
‘They treated women like meat’: Mark Judge’s college girlfriend calls him out for down-playing Georgetown Prep culture
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/tre...e+Raw+Story%29
Remember the Yale yell? "No Means Yes, Yes Means Anal"
He looks like the gang rape type, tbh. Thanks Avenatti
We can talk about Hillary.
The FBI has only been doing their job for 110 years, including vetting candidates to all sorts of political positions. They're obviously not infallible, no ins ution is, but we can certainly ascertain that the number of scandals during that tenure has been infinitesimal.
As far as that investigation, or any other, I don't have any reason or fact to mistrust their judgement. I can have an opinion of whether something is right or wrong, but an opinion doesn't a fact make. Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one.
No, I'm just not going to go off their word to harm someone else. I displayed very clearly why that is the case and you reduced it to "axe to grind with women". That's a ridiculous statement to make after a comment explaining the many factors involved.
Sure, what do you want to say about Hillary for distraction purposes in the Kavanaugh thread?
"the immunity handed out to Hillary people"
http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/“CDC: Nearly 1 in 5 Women Raped.” “One in Five U.S. Women Has Been Raped: CDC Survey.” These alarming headlines were typical of the coverage of last week’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report on sexual and intimate violence in the United States. The CDC study—the second in two years—seems to support a radical feminist narrative that has been gaining mainstream attention recently: that modern America is a “rape culture” saturated with misogynistic violence. But a closer look at the data, obtained from telephone surveys done in 2011, yields a far more complex picture and raises some surprising question about gender, victimization, and bias.
Both critics and supporters of the CDC’s methodology note the striking disparity between CDC figures and the Justice Department’s crime statistics based on the National Crime Victimization Survey (which includes crimes unreported to the police). While the CDC estimates that nearly 2 million adult American women were raped in 2011 and nearly 6.7 million suffered some other form of sexual violence, the NCVS estimate for that year was 238,000 rapes and sexual assaults.
Can you explain this article? The cdc concluded 1 in 5 women have been raped in the US. In order to come to that number they calculated in 2011 that 2mil women were raped and 6.7 million suffered from other sexual violence. Then they use your source that states there was only 238,000 rapes and sexual assaults that year which is 8.5 million less than the CDC but you are claiming 1 in 6 women have still been raped? So I'm not sure how that difference can exist and the end result be the same. Also if you don't mind taking a screen shot of where your source says 1 in 6 women that would be great.
Strawman
You said there were no men who raped women. It was stupid, but that was what you said.
People pretending this isn’t 100% political
I wasn't commenting on that.
So all the women are definitely lying, Darrin?
No, I was stating nobody because the numbers are inflated. Therefore the difference would be "nobody".
Probably a miscommunication there but that was what I was stating.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
