Reply With Quote
Who actually thought that?
at everyone who actually thought this
Who actually thought that?
People that post YouTube comments? Can't think of any other time I've seen someone say that.
Yheah, "put any elite shooter on the Warriors and they'd have Steph-level success" is one of the dumber narratives that somehow founds its way to the mainstream, tbh.
Disrespectful to the best player in the league and the most game-breaking player since Mikan . . .
Dame had one fluke series and then went right back to being the playoff choker he usually is, tbh. Media needs to stop the "Dame Time" shtick and put some respeck on CJ's name instead.
Aaaaw Timvp trying to emulate HH
The same CJ who defended like tonight?
License to Lollard
What is HH, tbh?
HarlemHeat37
Sucks off front runners
The same CJ who carried Dame to this series in the first place.
Still made Klay look like the GOAT SG
Playing with broke ribs ?
Still better than Porker
Dame’s injured.
What's the diagnosis? Currytus Rectum Strain?
Separated ribs.
So that’s how far Curry got his ?
Non-Issue ???
Nobody thought that. We said Dame > Westbrook, which is true.
completely untrue
completely true
Dame's 3pt% is about average for the league (career 36.8%), while Curry's is historically high (43.6%). Comparing Dame's 3pt shooting to Curry's is like comparing a 30% shooter's to Dame's. That's a huge difference (6.8%). Essentially the difference between Curry & Dame is the same as the difference between Dame & Westbrook, who is the worst high volume 3pt shooter in NBA history. It's statistically the same gap that exists between what a scout would call a "shooter" and a "nonshooter," or a guy with a "broken" shot. Oh, and Curry's 2pt% is higher too.
Last edited by R. DeMurre; 05-20-2019 at 08:23 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
