Reply With Quote
did they say how big his bank account grew?
did they say how big his bank account grew?
Yeah I love twitchy too bro
although probably not for the same reasons you do obviously
Ford had a few names as well, none of them recalled anything. Maybe they all had blackouts.
The ghost of Lindsey Graham makes the case for voting 'no' on perjury-prone Brett Kavanaugh
Lindsey Graham, a man who once defended the integrity of our courts over all else, is working his hardest to shove Brett Kavanaugh onto the Supreme Court, despite clear evidence that he has perjured himself over issues large and small.
Lying used to be a disqualifying characteristic for public office according to then Congressman Lindsey Graham.
Here he is making the case to impeach Bill Clinton based on a perjury charge.
‘I have argued to you that when you found that a judge was a perjurer, you couldn’t in good conscience send him back in a courtroom because everybody that came in that courtroom thereafter would have a real serious doubt’— @LindseyGrahamSC (January 1999)
Senator Blumenthal, yall:
br549-exlax3-burpyt-09.wutdafuk/v/dildomuffin-vagina/?
Cue the lying under oath arguments.
Because the Dems weren't communicating behind the scenes to make an accusation.. that's for sure.
100% apolitical, I swear on Julie´s life.
Are you going to watch it or do you no longer want to discuss false rape allegations?
This was corrected in a later article. He knew that Ramirez was circulating a text or email about him, but he didn't know what the allegation would be. That would make his answer consistent.
That said, you'll be hearing that he is a perjurer and a rapist for the rest of his existence if he is on the court, even if it is completely untrue.
Jake Tapper, yall:
Fattie really working over time for rapey over here. I bet you wanna be bent over for some skis, right DMC?
Lkrfan everybody
I dont think you two dummies get his tweet.
He's saying he lied under oath because he clearly knew about her prior to the new Yorker story breaking.
RapeyK said he didn't. That's a lie...under oath.
uhhh ..it was already "broke" if they asked him for comment. Typical Reck to get a hard on over the semantics of whether the story was public or published.I dont think you two dummies get his tweet.
He's saying he lied under oath because he clearly knew about her prior to the new Yorker story breaking.
RapeyK said he didn't. That's a lie...under oath.
Except phone texts show otherwise.weeks before the actual story broke.
Also
Why do you people project so much?
FBI Investigation could end as soon as tonight.
My mother makes $77 hourly at the laptop . She has been laid off for 5 months yet multi month quicker her test become$18713 on a to a wonderful degree key stage coping with the pc for a few hours. try this sit down
HERE☛ w*w*w.j*o*b*s*8*4.c*o*m™
please don't copy "(™)" in url thanks
Judiciary GOPers Blast Out Claims About Kavanaugh Accuser’s ‘Sexual Preferences’
released a bizarre letter Tuesday from a former TV weatherman in DC recounting his recollections about the “sexual preferences” of a woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.
emphasized excerpts from the letter focused on accuser Julie Swetnick’s alleged past sexual practices and provided a link to the full letter.
The Twitter account for the office of Judiciary Republican Orrin Hatch (UT) also tweeted out the letter, explaining that the sender, now based in Utah, first reached out to Hatch’s office about the “information” last week.
the Judiciary Committee seems to be putting in play the prior sexual activities of self-identified sexual assault victims.
he recalled a conversation with her about her sexual activities in high school.
Swetnick told Ketterer, according to the letter, that she “first tried sex with multiple guys while in high school and still liked it from time-to-time.”
“Julie never said anything about being sexually assaulted, raped, gang-raped or having sex against her will,”
the letter said.
“She never mentioned Brett Kavanaugh in any capacity.”
Ketterer concludes the letter by writing,
“based on my direct experience with Julie, I do not believe her allegations against Mr. Kavanaugh.”
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/jud...0%28TPMNews%29
Repugs are this absolutely sure this MALE is telling the truth, but all the FEMALES are lying.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-02-2018 at 06:40 PM.
Legit 2 days long investigation.
FBI bad now
Legit 2 days long investigation.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
