Congressional oversight isn't a coup.
The criming started.before inauguration day,. Even inauguration day itself was a family grift.
Congressional oversight isn't a coup.
I do agree with Jeet Heer that that centering foreign policy consensus is a red herring:
https://www.thenation.com/article/ke...hment-ukraine/Trump should not be impeached because he upset the national security establishment. Presidents have not just the right to disregard that establishment but, in fact, would usually be wise to do so. Nor should Trump be impeached because he undermined a Ukraine policy that has bipartisan support. After all, outside the consensus in Washington, there are many others who disagree with that policy. Even the fact that Trump runs a messy White House where goons like Giuliani are elbowing career diplomats isn’t really a good reason to impeach him. Giuliani is repugnant, but there’s ample precedent for a White House with private back channels. During the Kennedy administration, the president’s brother Robert Kennedy used a back channel with the USSR to help de-escalate during the Cuban missile crisis.
Regarding Ukraine, the most valid ground to impeach Trump is that he used his office for a corrupt purpose, to get a foreign government to slime a rival politician. That’s the offense that merits a cons utional rebuke and removal.
Do you get paid for your white house bootlicker role?
quoting Rush Limbaugh's gushing fandom
You called for an L? Here you go
The point of the exercise is to define (R)s as the embodiment of law and order and liberals as sick and rwisted subverters of the same.
Power is legitimate only when (R)s have it.
called it
changes nothing
‘Blather and hysteria’:
Conservative columnist explains why GOP anti-impeachment ‘antics’ just crashed and burned
The public impeachment hearings, Rubin noted, “seek to establish whether President Trump bribed a foreign power to help him smear a political rival”: former Vice President Joe Biden — and
Schiff “outlined the basic factual narrative” and
the “facts that Republicans have yet to contradict, let alone disprove.”
“Nunes ignored the factual account Schiff laid out, and
the contrast between the two sides — one relying on facts, and the other resorting to blather and hysteria — was clear,” Rubin asserts.
“The complete absence of any factual or legal defense (of Trump) was telling.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/bla...ed-and-burned/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...ual-bombs /
Huge cup of STFU delivered.
But the drama queens will on, because they are stho outraged over the *crimes* DJT committed.
FOH.
Propaganda Chris spreading falsehoods, as usual.
"What is the impeachment of Andrew Johnson?"
Modern history Pleb.
How many others have there been?
One?
Nixon resigned.
More snark. More victim declarations.No substance.
US history, profe. Doug Collins is ignorant of it.
Learn to read is thanks.
Troll thing tbh
Chris falling apart, barely makes sense.
Alright. Give me the rundown. I only listen to the Republican side on the radio. Limbaugh, Hanity, Levin got me convinced Trump did nothing wrong. I read Political subs on Reddit and you know what their stance is . Dems seem to be throwing at the wall and praying that something sticks. Russia, collusion, obstruction, now Ukraine. I want to hear a Democratic view that is not bat crazy like y Reddit libs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)