Reply With Quote
Because spurraider said Taibbi had access to everything.
you're just not connecting the dots, tbh
Because spurraider said Taibbi had access to everything.
Chan says he didn't say to look out for a hack and leak involving Hunter Biden, Roth said he was told to look out for a hack and leak involving Hunter Biden. Both statements given under oath. Are you claiming Roth lied under oath?
did any of them claim that twitter was instructed to suppress or censor anything
So what is Elon hiding according to you?
You're trying to move the goalposts again
If Roth's statements under oath are true the FBI had a role in Twitter suppressing the story.
im making multiple, distinct claims. nice dodge thoughYou're trying to move the goalposts again
no, not really.If Roth's statements under oath are true the FBI had a role in Twitter suppressing the story.
still nothing specific to the laptop story. and hard to say they had a role in twitter suppressing the story if they never told/asked twitter to suppress the story. i'm trusting Taibbi on this one
spurraider claim was that Taibi had access to everything related to takedowns (ie: TwItTeR FiLeS).
Do you know what Chan had access to?
Makes total sense for Elon to withhold the juiciest information from Taibbi!
The FBI didn't have to explicitly tell Twitter to suppress the story to have a role in Twitter suppressing the story. Roth was told by the FBI to look out for a Russian hack and leak concerning Hunter Biden. Twitter treated the laptop story as hacked materials, even though nothing from the laptop was hacked and leaked. Twitter suppressed the story based on a warning from the FBI ergo the FBI played a role in Twitter suppressing the story.
and... ergo, there was a pedo ring in the comet pizza parlor basement, which doesn't have a basement.
Taibbi had access to what Jim Baker allowed him access to. Baker has since been fired for inserting himself into the vetting process of what Taibbi would receive.
thinking Elon was personally releasing the information to Taibbi.
general counsel reviewing docs before sending them out to the press. terminable offense
Keep it up boot licker! Jim Baker ain't just some ter either.general counsel reviewing docs before sending them out to the press. terminable offense
musk came in day 1 and started cleaning house. fired all kinds of people. now we're supposed to believe he didnt even realize he was paying this guy on his staff?
I don't care what Musk realized or didn't realize. Jim Baker is a worthless "ex" FBI agent and you're still a boot licker.
Musk and his rabble cult now attacking Wikipedia
We Are Watching Elon Musk and His Fans
Create a Conspiracy Theory About Wikipedia in Real Time
https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjk5...a-in-real-time
America is wasting so much energy, attention on trivial
Oh hey it's tsa rodeo day
whats your specific beef with jim baker?I don't care what Musk realized or didn't realize. Jim Baker is a worthless "ex" FBI agent and you're still a boot licker.
Of course this was common knowledge but it's funny watching dip s like you back peddle after dismissing such common knowledge as conspiracies not even a couple months ago. It's a tale as old as time tbh; make jokes at the expense of those in the know until it's clear as day what's gone on and then pivot to your cliche response above. Rinse and repeat!
I am waiting for him to masterfully add the "satanic, children-eating hillary cabal" into the narrative.
Wait a minute, you truly have to ask? You're a lawyer right? You spend most of your time in this sub forum right? And you act like you're so in the know of politics so why are you asking what my beef is with Baker when you should damn well know already. It's cute how you continue to play coy you lawyer.
Baker is a hack just like you. Difference is you weren't in the FBI peddling some bs dosier.
Lick them boots!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
