Gulf of Mexico is averaging 2 degrees warmer than 30 years ago. This enabled Harvey to rebuild into a major storm quicker than would have been the case a generation ago.
Science is not something that you "believe" in. Science doesn't give a what you believe. Climate change is is established and has data to back it. You have facts to the contrary, produce it (allegories do not count for crap).
Gulf of Mexico is averaging 2 degrees warmer than 30 years ago. This enabled Harvey to rebuild into a major storm quicker than would have been the case a generation ago.
Ah the age old debate of who to trust more about our climate: climate scientists or Republicans?
You mean science like: eggs are good for, no wait, eggs are bad for you. Fat is good for you, no wait, fat is bad for you, no wait again, fat is good for you.
Scientist change their mind all the time. These are in the moment theories.
Science will conform new facts. You have new facts regarding climate change, please share them with the 99% of scientists agree climate change is real and affected by human activity. If all you have is Fox News gibberish, go to sciencenews.com and educate yourself a bit.
A tweet from POTUS will do the job.
Agreed. Not too long ago it was, margarine (with eliadic trans fatty acid) was considered much healthier than butter. And fat, rather than starchy carbs, were linked to obesity.
Lotta talk about semantics in this thread
MiG would rather talk pedantry than flatly admit he be wrong
Did you take a smallpox vaccine?
Thanks for this, that was a helpful article tbh.
Can confirm the link between the Memorial Day floods and the Saturday night flooding since I was here for both. The Saturday night bands were lethal and it had rain coming out at 5-6 inches per hour in some readings. Those definitely did the most damage and Sunday morning is when the nation woke up and saw Houston underwater. We had moderate/heavy rainfall over the next few days but those were just the cherry on top.
I was wrong.
What does this mean? Moment theories?
Darwin was wrong and/or lacked evidence concerning a number of aspects of natural selection as a driver of evolution. So is natural selection an "in the moment theory"? Refinement has occurred.
Newton's ideas about gravity are not exact enoug when dealing with big distance, does this mean his in the moment theory is wrong concerning gravity? Will apples now fall differently? Refinement has occurred.
This whole deal is partially a press problem, and then just flat out lies concerning science. When you look at food science and look at what the press presents realize two things:
1. The press likes wow findings. So they pick up on and rewrite articles in weak journals they know will have an impact. "Oh, pure bacon grease is NOW good for you, Fckn science"
2. Food science is biology, and biology is extraordinarily difficult to control and get as meaningful results as chemistry, and especially physics.
With Climate we have good ways of gathering data and weighing the meaning. When people who do this for a living tell us why they think that man made warming is occurring I'm going with it. WTF, would they all just collude and lie together? More notoriety comes from actually doing solid science that comes from refuting something that others missed. (And it also brings the delusional WC gadflys who think they are geniuses in an area they have taken up as a hobby.)
All of the denyial basically comes from the same idea. The earth atmosphere has warmed and cooled significantly before. So these little insignificant creatures CANNOT have a real role. TThis is just flat out WRONG. Many species have had huge effects on the earth that have been catastrophic for some species.
When photosynthetic organisms first evolved, the Earth had almost zero O2 in the atmosphere and anaerobic organisms ruled the earth. As O2 was produced and reacted with surroundings making oxides, there was little affect on the atmosphere. When the oxygen sink was full, the O2 was now free to hang about in the atmosphere. Now the earth has a full 20% level of O2! And the anaerobes, you gotta look in very special environments to find them. Aerobic organisms rule as far as speciation and sheer numbers.
So BS to this notion we can't change or have little effect on what was already an Earth that already has undergone temperature changes. Ignorant Conservatives are conservative for a reason. The switch for a non changing world is stuck on matters that don't fit their worldview. Why don't they argue that water is not H2O? We have never ever directly seen a water molecule? A: It has little impact on their dogma.
so what you're really saying is you've been brainwashed by liberal ins utions
Looks like we are getting close. Googley boogley.
Man that shut you up real quick, cbf.
A category 5 hurricane forming in the Pacific and heading directly to Bay area leading to the disappearance of 2 individuals known as cupcake and donkey.
What's good, man? What are you doing in the field these days?
with sharks
Twelve years later and even libturds aren't calling it global warming.
It's Tuesday September 12th and it's 63 degrees
Normal variance.
It's going to be 94/75 next week in Dallas, probably more in SA. Just saying
As recently as Sept 2013, it was 106 degrees in Denton on September 30th (and most of early September as well it was around 107 degrees that year in Denton).
So is it still called global warming? Or climate change?
Cbf 05 EXPOSED LOL
Why is the name so important to you?
The overarching theory is the carbon dioxide theory of climate change. Global warming is one of the indicators of it
It's been called climate change going back as far as the 50's. There wasn't some liberal plot in the 2000's to replace global warming with climate change
Because it was brought to the masses (in the 90s) as global warming with alarm bells ringing that within 20 years the earth as we know it would be destroyed. Then, when the earth wasn't destroyed, it was changed to climate change.
Now, either someone (the community) was purposely lying, or their calculations are just way off. Either of those choices isn't great.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)