Deserved.
Deserved.
Good. There is no amount of public shaming that will ever be enough. Sadly, they're paying mere pennies compared to what they've done. Money is a uva drug.
What does Epstein have to do with this movie or Hollywood?
how do you mention someone on here?
Someone needs to @DJR
He's lumped in with the other pedophile elitists as Hollywood is synonymous with "rich elitists"?
You spell the screen name right.
More then just this one billboard.
I hope this catches on:
Beyond the billboard, there are ads at numerous bus stops, some on benches and others behind glass. Insiders say a street crew worked through the night to get the phony ads in place before the sun rose on Friday.
One bench ad uses an image of Woody Allen instead of Polanski, as Allen was accused of abusing his adoptive daughter, Dylan Farrow, when she was 7.
The artist behind the alterations goes by the name Sabo, and he says that the faux ads are meant to insult the entertainment industry for embracing Polanski, who plead guilty to sex with a minor four decades ago, and, to a lesser extent Epstein, who was arrested July 6 for sex trafficking of minors.
I don't know the end of it. So it's just "@screename"?
cantthinkofanything
wow....that's easy.
What's the end of DJR's screen name? How do I look that up?
Loses focus quickly with Epstein and Allen IMO. Polanski makes since because he's a character in the movie but most people driving by probably don't know what he looks like. Guess they needed another head to replace in the posters.
oh....and thanks re
Don't you think this is more a comment directed at the rich getting away with pedophilia? As opposed to just a slam on HW.
well thats convenient
oh some unrelated rich guy did bad things? HOLLYWOOD IN ITS ENTIRETY!
So "Pedowood" is more a state of mind?
This gets cornier with every question.
I don't know.
@sirjohnny
not sure what's up with the empty quote boxes. I only did one.
Last edited by MultiTroll; 07-26-2019 at 02:02 PM. Reason: multiquites empty?
Whoa, settle down there cowboy. I didn't say that, I was speculating that's their reasoning. Who really knows?
What's it matter tho? You're really critiquing the reasoning/connection to the parody for shaming pedophiles/ complaining that it's not more accurate? LOL
to a lesser extent Epstein, who has really nothing at all to do with Hollywood but whatevs!
Not sure they put as much thought into this as you are.
I am complaining that it loses focus pretty much immediately.
Polanksi's is a weird case overall, but may as well keep the focus there.
Which is funny to me since they're the ones going through all that trouble.
They did make sure they got Sabo's name out there, so mission accomplished.
There was just a small uproar about Polanski in Venice so it's pretty timely.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)