"Muh Sweden."

[tholdren]

Looks like Ifr going to drop more.

[tholdren]

New York times walkout. Uh oh.....

[RandomGuy]

Abcde.... but you lied. I gave you the website to run the data. You just don't understand what your looking at. Hence your inability to logically reason.

Glad you found it imperative to address your shortcomings

You gave me a tweet? Whadimiss?

Do you think your inability to answer direct questions and inability to provide source data when asked makes your assessment of my abilities more, or less credible?

[RandomGuy]

Even the dumb cdc knows coronaviruses are seasonal

So in summary:
For the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, we have reason to expect that like other betacoronaviruses, it may transmit somewhat more efficiently in winter than summer, though we don’t know the mechanism(s) responsible. The size of the change is expected to be modest, and not enough to stop transmission on its own. Based on the analogy of pandemic flu, we expect that SARS-CoV-2, as a virus new to humans, will face less immunity and thus transmit more readily even outside of the winter season. Changing seasons and school vacation may help, but are unlikely to stop transmission. Urgent for effective policy is to determine if children are important transmitters, in which case school closures may help slow transmission, or not, in which case resources would be wasted in such closures. Previously it was thought children were not easily infected with SARS-CoV-2. Recent evidence from Shenzhen suggests that children may be infected and shed detectable virus at about the same rate as adults — so now the only question is whether they transmit as readily. It seems likely the answer is yes, but no data as of this writing to my knowledge.

https://ccdd.hsph.harvard.edu/will-c...armer-weather/

tholdren

Go ahead and fail to post a study that shows this one actually is now that has had any peer review. Snot-nosed, punk-ass poser.

[tholdren]

You gave me a tweet? Whadimiss?

Do you think your inability to answer direct questions and inability to provide source data when asked makes your assessment of my abilities more, or less credible?

Already answered them. You quoted me by using quotes you entered. So really you lied because you dont understand numbers you pretend to be able to understand. You tried to say the graph was mislabeled, which it wasn't, and just continue to look silly. Sorry your math skills are terrible.

[RandomGuy]

Already answered them. You quoted me by using quotes you entered. So really you lied because you dont understand numbers you pretend to be able to understand. You tried to say the graph was mislabeled, which it wasn't, and just continue to look silly. Sorry your math skills are terrible.

I didn't say the graph was mislabeled, I said there was an obvious typo.

You didn't see it. You suck at this.

[RandomGuy]

Already answered them. You quoted me by using quotes you entered. So really you lied because you dont understand numbers you pretend to be able to understand. You tried to say the graph was mislabeled, which it wasn't, and just continue to look silly. Sorry your math skills are terrible.

X axis labels from left to right:

2007-8
2009-9
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20


Am I wrong here about the typo? Did the 2008-09 flu season stretch from the 40th week of 2009 backwards in time to the 18th week?

It was a moebius year that folded back in on itself according you?

[RandomGuy]

Do you think your inability to answer direct questions and inability to provide source data when asked makes your assessment of my abilities more, or less credible?

Already answered them. You quoted me by using quotes you entered. So really you lied because you dont understand numbers you pretend to be able to understand. You tried to say the graph was mislabeled, which it wasn't, and just continue to look silly. Sorry your math skills are terrible.

[tholdren]

X axis labels from left to right:

2007-8
2009-9
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20


Am I wrong here about the typo? Did the 2008-09 flu season stretch from the 40th week of 2009 backwards in time to the 18th week?

It was a moebius year that folded back in on itself according you?

Lol correcting grammar and not math. You do you math wizard

[tholdren]

What are the time periods reflected by the bars in that graph? i.e. how long of a time period does that data represent and when is the cutoff?



(ignoring the obvious typo in his X axis labels)-RG

Remember this. You couldn't even read the graph.. lololo sp you deferring to spelling mistakes. Bwahahahha you bad with numbers man.

[RandomGuy]

You quoted me by using quotes you entered.

Just FYI, the quotes have links to the source quote. Anyone can see exactly how evasive and ty you are at this.

Yes or no, are my summaries accurate?

Why limit yourself to the flu season data for something that is not conforming to flu season patterns?

Why use this metric rather than that of a whole year?

If you exclude the most recent month, that happens to have the most deaths, how might that affect your conclusion about the severity of the disease?

Would not a better comparison be take 30 weeks of data from the start of the outbreak in that country?

Lol coronaviruses are proven to be sharply seasonal and yes, covid 19 is following the same curve. [LOL and not a direct answer to any question-RG]


Lol you melting down because you can't arrange the data and see the seasonality or the trend. You can only read about inaccurate daily counts and gossip. And name call. Lolololol [LOL and not a direct answer to any question-RG]

In terms of your other ignorant question. If covid was as bad as you say why does the graph show consistency in all cause fatalities. I.e where's all those extras? [Deflecting question-RG]

Lol you dont know how to get that data. Lol.

My shorthand: lols and deflecting questions-RG

Coronaviruses are seasonal.

Past Coronaviruses have been seasonal.
What study do you have that supports the conclusion that this one is?
If so what is it's "Season"?

Coronaviruses are "sharply" seasonal. [restatement of assertion-RG] Covid 19 following same curve. But you wouldn't know that because you can't understand daily reporting...[chest thumping about how much smarter you think you are than I am-RG]

[My short-hand: re-states assertion, engages in chest-thumping-RG].

Direct question:

Which of my characterizations are inaccurate and why?

[RandomGuy]

Lol correcting grammar and not math. You do you math wizard

I couldn't even get to the math because you don't answer questions honestly.

[RandomGuy]

Remember this. You couldn't even read the graph.. lololo sp you deferring to spelling mistakes. Bwahahahha you bad with numbers man.

What statement of mine most supports your assertion that I couldn't read the graph?

I expect more .

[RandomGuy]

Do you think your inability to answer direct questions and inability to provide source data when asked makes your assessment of my abilities more, or less credible?

Lol correcting grammar and not math. You do you math wizard

Do you think your inability to answer direct questions and inability to provide source data when asked makes your assessment of my abilities more, or less credible?

[SpursforSix]

[RandomGuy]

Well played.

[SpursforSix]

Well played.

It's the gifT that keeps on giving.

[tholdren]

Do you think your inability to answer direct questions and inability to provide source data when asked makes your assessment of my abilities more, or less credible?

Lol deflection. Grammar p9lice deflectiion with 5 posts in a row. Lololololol you don't know.why daily cases or daily fatalities doesn't matter. Bwahahhahahahah can't read graphs. Lolololol

[RandomGuy]

Sorry man, I'm married. Not my thing anyway.

[Chucho]

It's the gifT that keeps on giving.

You'd get banned if you posted hardcore, gay porn gifs for derp and Chump, huh?

[tholdren]

Sorry man, I'm married. Not my thing anyway.

Just to be clear, you had no mathematical understanding of ifr or trend data so you deflect. Its okay to be ashamed. Your math analytics are terrible.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Just to be clear, you had no mathematical understanding of ifr or trend data so you deflect. Its okay to be ashamed. Your math analytics are terrible.

Not persuaded. Assertions without support are to be ignored

[tholdren]

Not persuaded. Assertions without support are to be ignored

There is only assertion of lockdown. Cdc added over 7k lagged cases over normal avg lag today. Lol those daily cases tho.

[tholdren]

Do you think your inability to answer direct questions and inability to provide source data when asked makes your assessment of my abilities more, or less credible?

I did answer them.
You - why did you use that seasonal data
Me - coronaviruses have been proven to be sharply seasonal
You - what is your proof that covid 19 is seasonal its not following flu pattern
Me - it's seasonal curve of cases based on state reporting data.. it does follow a sharply seasonal curve look at the data
You - you misspelled something so its not seasonal....


As I have said before with daily rates daily fatalities and trends, you are not smart enough to chart the data so all you can do is use headline data inaccurately. See above.

You aren't good with numbers there's no shame in that, unless you gossip about the numbers like you know more than daily rates, which you don't, so it is a problem.

Until then I will be here to let you know how wrong you are.

[tholdren]

I did answer them.
You - why did you use that seasonal data
Me - coronaviruses have been proven to be sharply seasonal
You - what is your proof that covid 19 is seasonal its not following flu pattern
Me - it's seasonal curve of cases based on state reporting data.. it does follow a sharply seasonal curve look at the data
You - you misspelled something so its not seasonal....


As I have said before with daily rates daily fatalities and trends, you are not smart enough to chart the data so all you can do is use headline data inaccurately. See above.

You aren't good with numbers there's no shame in that, unless you gossip about the numbers like you know more than daily rates, which you don't, so it is a problem.

Until then I will be here to let you know how wrong you are.