Reply With Quote
Spurs are getting blowout out and the refs sre still calling bad callslol...no need refs the game is over.....
I have never a seen a fraud team getting exposed so swift and complete like that..
Spurs are getting blowout out and the refs sre still calling bad callslol...no need refs the game is over.....
5th best team in the league, tbh...Lack of versatility, too dependent on Old vets (mainly TD/Gino) and a washed up bench
GSW > CLE > OKC > Clippers (healthy)> Spurs
this team basically fattened up both record and point differential in a cupcake first 3 months..
Good thing the Warriors won 73, otherwise the playoff collapse would have been even more embarrassing.
2007 Mavericks beg to differ...
2006-07 Mavs says hi
No way. I think we beat Cle or Clips this year, and OKC only just beat us. It was ing close. Bounce of the ball goes the other way on one or two possessions and we win games 2 and 5 and the series. Everyone is forgetting there was a lot of terrible luck in game 2 and 5 losses.5th best team in the league, tbh
GSW > CLE > OKC > Clippers (healthy)> Spurs
This, but what do you expect from reactionary fans. They dont understand sports....
Also, the most overrated team would be the 67 win Mavs team that lost in round 1.
There's no such thing as an overrated team in the NBA. Every team plays each other. Hence, no ratings/rankings. Those 67 wins were legit.
In college basketball, they use rankings based on opinions; that's where you find overrated and underrated teams.
Capisce?
Ill spell it for you. third tier star aldridge getting 1b option touches. needs to change.
ed up with Timmy in a walker, but funny too.
Maybe like the 2009 cavs
Is Mic e a Spurs fan?
Cavs would've beaten the Spurs too, they're much hungrier.
the decline of the bench throughout the season lowered our teams ceiling. I hate taking the pessimistic route when supporting the Spurs, but people like Amused called the comparison to 2011 Spurs. The only difference is this year's West was ty that the Spurs were still able to put up wins despite looking mediocre.
2016 Spurs were more overrated and it isn't even close. It's all about matchups. The Mavs ran into the one and only team in the NBA that matched up well against them. The Spurs played an elite team. The Spurs were flirting with record breaking point differentials before finishing at 10.6. The Mavs finished with a PD of 7.2. The Spurs lost 1 home game while the Mavs lost 5. I could go on like this......
yep..For much of the season, Spurs were put on the same pedestal as the 73-win pace Warriors who were equally put the same pedestal with 96 Bulls as the GOAT team..
never had that debate opened with regard to '07 Mavs, '09 Cavs...
What else do you see in your alternate reality crystal ball? What happened when Ray Allen missed that 3?
Yeah it is, and when you lose to a Thunder team (possibly our worst matchup) on a couple of bull calls and bad bounces of the ball that doesnt make you overrated. The MAvs werent even close in that series. They got thoroughly dominated by an 8 seed. So you can go suck a tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
