Reply With Quote
Just the mere claim that the New York Times retraction implies that "There was no police officers killed at the Capitol during the protests" is on it's face false.
There isn't much more to scrutinize past that.
Then you're just bold-faced lying.
You lost the script, ElShillo.
Just the mere claim that the New York Times retraction implies that "There was no police officers killed at the Capitol during the protests" is on it's face false.
There isn't much more to scrutinize past that.
You're the one posting bold faced lies. The fact that you don't own up to it doesn't make me a shill.
Another Democrat stand-down order
pobrecito Derp tan wey
Where is your proof of this, derp?
I'm calling you out.
Prove your claim or fold and cry (endlessly).
All's you're doing is 900 DPH.
Why not stipulate it as true? The political affiliation of one participant proves nothing.
Your claim is garbage and now you may cry for your daddeh.
Why stipulate it as true when he can't even prove that?
Sometimes a silly claim is more easily disposed of by granting it then and following it to its logical consequences, if any. Derp is never going to try to support his own BS.
It's easier to make derp fold immediately and abandon his claim.
No that's actually a picture of you. It says so right here in the text i'm typing.
so gullible
hmm, it seldom seems to work out that way in practice. Derp never abandons his claims.
Derp will sperm shield for anything and everything that helps him to cope.
You should know this at this point.
more 'actors' charged...
9 Oath Keepers charged with sweeping conspiracy for role in Capitol insurrection
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...rection-470308
that’s you to a “t”, derp
Yup. That's what Derp (ChumpDumper) and ElDerpo do (ElNono).
Does being called Derp bother you?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
