thats some classic sfs content
Not to mention wanting to rape someone that just went poo. Gross!!!
thats some classic sfs content
You still haven't give a take
Exactly, that's why I don't get what's the endgame here...
tEh biBle
the end game is "trans people bad" and if you disagree you want girls to get raped
Irony, rank hypocrisy.
Which do you think is more appropriate for someone who never has a take, to be ing about someone not having take?
I have plenty of takes. You just ignore them because you're not up on my level intellectually.
You're right. I'm above your level.
Mostly because you seem to have some sort of reading disability. You seem fairly smart otherwise.
lol pulling rank
"you are beneath me" exudes poise and confidence.
So sexual assault is still illegal.
Board anti-trans concern trolls with the hair trigger response shown up by emerging facts...
But what about alternative facts?!?!
Notice how TSA slowly walked away from this thread after tossing the grenade...
Am sure tsa would reply but he is still recovering and/or is in Korea, where they force you to work 24/7 without internet.
Am sure his response would be: “Got to protect our women from transgenders in bathroom, regardless of alternate facts!”
The difference between irony and hypocrisy is that, in irony, it is a twist of the cir stances, but in hypocrisy, it is not so. It is a pretense. An individual pretense can relate to many things. It can be behavior, beliefs, at udes, qualities or even opinions.
pseudo internet intellectual
more irony
His pretense keeps bloviating.
That isn't what irony is.
Reading disability keeps you from recognizing the difference, or in this case, the similarity.
Your post was actually both ironic and hypocritical.
Irony being the expectation that someone who criticizes others for not having a take would normally be expected to have takes on things. This is not the case for you, hence: irony.
The vast majority of your posts are simply personal attacks, with the post I am responding to being a representative example.
In this case your criticism of someone for not having a take was also hypocritical, since you almost never have a take.
Instead you prefer to generally lie about what someone believes, if your learning disability even allows you to understand what they believe in the first place. Lying or unable, I can't figure out which.
Further irony is an internet pseudo-intellectual trying to call out someone else for that, and doing so in such an obviously flawed way that it marks them as an pseudo-intellectual.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 10-27-2021 at 11:04 AM.
Did my post before seeing this.
Looks like I was not alone in finding the "incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs."
Whoopsie? Your article confirms he was wearing a skirt when he assaulted her in the girl's bathroom.
Like I said from the start...girl sodomized by boy wearing skirt in girl’s bathroom. Sodomized girl’s father arrested at school board meeting debating bathroom policy. School board denied knowledge of sodomy while bathroom policy being debated.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)