is getting raped worse when the person raping wears a skirk?
You still don't understand it
Leaning on Blake for understanding
is getting raped worse when the person raping wears a skirk?
You own a skirt?
Explain it for me. Post the definition of irony, then show how I used it incorrectly.
i·ro·ny1
/ˈīrənē/
noun
the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
"“Don't go overboard with the gra ude,” he rejoined with heavy irony"
hy·poc·ri·sy
/həˈpäkrəsē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.
"his target was the hypocrisy of suburban life"
they were a couple who'd used the bathroom for consensual sex a few times beforehand.
this isn't a case of a male using a women's restroom under the false pretense of genderfluidity to rape someone, it's a Romeo and Juliet situation that escalated to violence.
They killed themselves?
I never presented it as a case of a male using a women's restroom under false pretense to rape. I posted this because of the coverup by the school board while bathroom policy was being debated.
what an amazing follow up question
just meant that they were lovers under 18.
then why are you so hung up on the skirt?
If he wasn't wearing a skirt and in the girl's bathroom do you think the school board would have covered up the rape while bathroom policy was being debated?
That is just the definition, lazy .Explain it for me. Post the definition of irony, then show how I used it incorrectly.
hypocrisy:
The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess;
Specific example of how your statements are hypocritical:
Promotes virtue of having substantive posts, i.e. "takes", but not possessing that virtue.
---------------------------------------
irony:
"an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected."
Specific example one:
Expected: poster criticizing others for not having substance, has substantive positions.
Opposite outcome: poster does not have substantive positions.
Specific example two that Blake and I both found amusing:
Expected: poster criticizing someone for being a pseudo intellectual can use language correctly, and understand requests.
Opposite outcome: poster does neither.
If he wasn't wearing a skirt and in the girl's bathroom do you think the school board would have covered up the rape while bathroom policy was being debated?
Dunno. Feel free to speculate, but that's just speculation.
i have no clue wtf the school was thinking, but i dont see why the skirt is relevant. was the rapist transgender?
now tell me if rape is worse when the rapist wears a skirt
Last edited by spurraider21; 10-27-2021 at 12:04 PM.
It's in your posts. You do your own legwork.
YoU'rE NoT CoNnEcTiNg ThE dOtS!
I think he would have said the same thing even if a skirt wasn't involved.
Either way, the superintendent ed up and/or lied, yet you want him to be the arbiter on whether this is a transgender-related issue.
Unless you were homeschooled, I'm sure you realize consensual sex, and assault, in school restrooms is not a new thing.
It appears the school board thought that if the revealed that a boy wearing a skirt had raped a girl in the girl's bathroom that it would hurt their chances of getting the transgender bathroom policy passed. I don't see any other reason for them to conceal the rape during the bathroom policy debate.
Your skirt rape question is ridiculous
"it appears" appears to be impersonally constructed, but in fact it's just TSA making a guess.
Translation:
"I just realized I got pantsed but don't want to admit it".
alternately:
"I do too have a girlfriend in Canada, you just can't see pictures".
I accept your surrender.
This. The whole issue is kinda not overly relevant to the wider debate.
Akin to wanting to ban all guns because of one nutbar with a pistol.
yeah...personally, it'd be way more demoralizing.
the skirt rape is your entire narrative
you dont care about the rape. you're just looking for a nonexistent opportunity to dunk on trans people
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)