Reply With Quote
Why do you care what he thinks?
There was never any chance he would be convicted of anything. White man's fear is an impossible hurdle to overcome now as always.
Why do you care what he thinks?
i thought the video on the attempt murder was unclear.
it was clear the guy who was shot had a handgun and ran up to rittenhouse, and if kyle shot him right then, i would have given him even more benefit of the doubt. but instead he aimed his rifle at the guy, who put his hands up. it then looked like the guy tried running and from the angle of the footage i thought it looked like he was running toward the sidewalk, and not at kyle. and then kyle shot him. so just from that footage, it looked like kyle paused, recognized the guy surrendered to him, and then shot him anyway.... which looked bad
but the victim's testimony basically said that he was in fact approaching kyle after his "surrender". if the prosecutors ever spoke with him pre-trial, they'd have known what his testimony would be
Why did the Judge dismiss the charges with prejudice after the verdict? Is that routine after a not guilty verdict or was he ruling on the defense motion to dismiss with prejudice?
Not a victim.
Who is Conor Mitc and why do you follow him?
Who is Paul West and why do you follow him?
Big day for SnakeBoi.
You have got to be kidding?
There are people who think this verdict was improper?
I would have never thought people on twitter would do this.
How did you find this Snake? Its like one would never expect this, but you somehow found these influential takes?
Thanks for the breaking news find. TSA level effort im guessing...
no surprise.
now we can see the conservatives pretend to care about looting again lol
Is anyone actually surprised by the ruling? 100% expected this tbh
No it’s clear cut it should not have even gone to jury
Judge thought otherwise
Oh Dumper stop being so dramatic the Sky Is Not Falling.
Time to mature like I have and move past the divisive skin color narrative, buddy.
You know this one
pretty sure thats routine. would be double jeopardy otherwise
he's definitely a victim of a shooting. not a victim of crime though
Plenty of people who only watched MSM coverage before the trial are shocked.
The Media's Verdict on Kyle Rittenhouse
Here is what I thought was true about Kyle Rittenhouse during the last days of August 2020 based on mainstream media accounts: The 17-year-old was a racist vigilante. I thought he drove across state lines, to Kenosha, Wisc., with an illegally acquired semi-automatic rifle to a town to which he had no connection. I thought he went there because he knew there were Black Lives Matter protests and he wanted to start a fight. And I thought that by the end of the evening of August 25, 2020, he had done just that, killing two peaceful protestors and injuring a third.
It turns out that account was mostly wrong.
Unless you’re a regular reader of independent reporting — Jacob Siegel of Tablet Magazine and Jesse Singal stand out for being ahead of the pack (and pilloried, like clockwork, for not going along with the herd) — you would have been served a pack of lies about what happened during those terrible days in Kenosha. And you would have been shocked over the past two weeks as the trial unfolded in Wisconsin as every core claim was undermined by the evidence of what actually happened that night.
This wasn’t a disinformation campaign waged by Reddit trolls or anonymous Twitter accounts. It was one pushed by the mainstream media and sitting members of Congress for the sake of an expedient political narrative—a narrative that asked people to believe, among other unrealities, that blocks of burning buildings somehow cons uted peaceful protests.
https://bariweiss.substack.com/p/the...le-rittenhouse
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
