lol race baiting.
Now, I don't have time but later I will explain you with facts why Bird is better.
I've been saying this here forever, the media is always late with these takes
I won't elaborate much more, though, since the feds are on alert, disguising my IP here isn't sufficient..in regards to criticism, there are 3 pro athletes that cause White people to get DEEPLY offended: Michael Jordan, Peyton Manning and Larry Bird..I've learned my lesson in the past..
lol race baiting.
Now, I don't have time but later I will explain you with facts why Bird is better.
Last edited by DAF86; 12-06-2018 at 08:36 PM.
LeBron too if you buy KD
Bird would be perfect for tsays NBA
Ehlo would be the equivalent of Klay Thompson tbh
And Bird would be able to readapt his technique.
Didn’t he injure his wrist early in his career and had to tweak his shooting technique?
Worked out pretty well for him ybh
He also played with a ed up back for a good part of his career.
Adjusted pretty well
Imagine hyping up a white American player who played against plumbers.
imagine mark price in this era
i disagree for my aforementioned reasons
he was able to do that given the landscape of the league at that current time and he was a savant in his era. just because he did that back then is not proof or anything of meaning that he could hang in today's league.
if i played back in the 50/60's i'd be considered an all time great for that era. not because i would be more athletic but because my skills and moveset would be so much mroe advanced.
I'd argue the opposite, but since you perceive it to be so, chalk it up to being of the perks for being treated anywhere from second class citizens to vermin throughout history.
Jackson not bowing down to your white god doesn't automatically make him a racist. I don't see the white media (that's supposed to at least pretend to be unbiased) chastised for openly cheerleading for Doncic and Jokic.
He would be MVP candidate every year tbh
That’s not how it works there is no time travel machine
If Bird played today he would have benefited from a different system , nutrition, training , etc etc
Didn't Jim Jackson play for 27 nba teams.
Dude, I couldn't give less of a about Bird. I'm also well outside the black/white war. I just call it like I see it. If some no name red neck would say anything like that about a black icon, he would get called a racist and be bullied out of his job.
I understand the history, but at some point you gotta get past that.
Bird: 24.3 ppg - 10 rpg - 6.3 apg - 0.8 bpg - 1.7 spg - 50 FG% - 38 3pt % - 7.2 bpm - 79.7 VORP
Magic: 19.4 ppg - 7.2 rpg - 11.2 apg - 0.2 bpg - 1.9 spg - 52 FG% - 30 3pt% - 7.2 bpm - 77.4 VORP
Most categories favour Bird. Also, if you look at defensive metrics, Bird also has Magic beat. There's just no argument to say Magic was better. They are more or less the same player with Bird having an abysmal advantage on the most important aspect in basketball: shooting.
If someone were to draft these players today, you would be a fool to take Magic over Bird.
Lakers Stern bogus foul calls awarded:
Magic: No calculator big enough to total.
gots stats would drop by 20% if he was made to play like non Lakers.
What a buch of stupid mother ers
Bird was a big dude and had a crazy jumpshot. Better than 95% of todays nigas
Can u imagine him in todays game where you cant even breathe on a shooter?
This mother er bird would dominate this got ass game of today
This niga gets it
todays got nba where you cant even sneeze on a mother er without fouling out
Another player who would obliterate this ladyboy league f today is Mugsy Bogues
Remember, you cannot even bat an eyelash on a player without getting a flagrant 1 in this league
Remember, that skill-less pathetic midget from the celtics Isiah Thomas was dominating cuple years ago
Mugsy would be hands down MVP in todays made league
I have no contention with this and agree with it
So that completely derails the main point because if bird were to benefit from all that then that is not the bird we know and are talking about that’s a completely different player/en y/person altogether that has never existed before and therefore a comparison or hypothetical cannot be made. But even if bird grew up in this era scouts would not be looking at him in HS or college because of all the freak athletes he would have to compete with he’d be drowned out
I was under the assumption that the scenario is you put prime 1980s Larry Bird into the contemporary NBA and my assertion is that his skill set would not translate well into today’s game And would basically suck
Last edited by E20; 12-06-2018 at 10:19 PM.
at all these arguments about how much more superior athletically today’s nba players are when guys like curry and Durant are dominating the league. When Thompson is some sort of mad player and Draymond green is some lynchpin to a dynasty. , how athletic is Kawhi? Harden? Doncic? Jokic? Lillard?
The only players who are exceptionally athletic and dominating the league are Lebron, Westbrook and Davis. And westbrrom is the only one out of the three who is putting up great numbers strictly because of his athleticism. And his teams generally suck.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)