Darrin we can all disagree about a lot around here but I think we can all agree don't nobody want to hear from you here. Please logoff asap.
sigh
i also mentioned kamala at the debate more than once
Darrin we can all disagree about a lot around here but I think we can all agree don't nobody want to hear from you here. Please logoff asap.
not necessary to tell him to log off, Darrin has been pulverized so many times on this forum that his posts amount to either 1 sentence hit and runs or YouTube videos if someone asks him to elaborate.
It may be wishful thinking but I do think Biden is a possible exception to my post. If Biden can swing even 10% of the rural vote that could make the difference. Then it becomes a question of whether liberals show up, and I understand the concern from Aaron's perspective because it sounds like we have a pretty similar Twitter feed
That doesn't mean he's my favorite candidate on the issues (and the debates have been disheartening). But the idea of impacting some of the 2016 Trump vote isn't without merit. It's only moot if we assume that the reverse effect is liberals not being motivated enough to vote for a center-skewing liberal over Trump.
I thought he might be voting for Biden so I'm clearly the dumbest person here.
Darrin currently supports one democrat: JFK who's been dead for 60 years conveniently
I like how he calls Trump Drumpf because he wants to convince everyone he’s not a Trumper so his positive commentary on Trump will seem more credible when everyone here knows he voted for Trump
”guys I don’t even like Drumpf (obviously since I’m calling him DRUMPF) so I’m not biased here but I think he’s maybe the best president we’ve had since Reagan!”
He supports JFK for lowering the top marginal tax rate from 91% to an ultra low 70%
I think whatever actual arguments and facts that are lacking in painting Biden as a communist will get made up for with more repe ion and volume by right wing media outlets, not to mention the love he gets from a lot of Dems for being black president’s VP can easily be flipped in the other direction with Republicans.
I’d actually agree with you 4 years ago (when Biden should have run), but now those rural voters love Trump too much. Biden’s campaign is also not going to swing any voters, he’s making the same mistake Hillary made. All he does during the debates is say some semblance “TRUMP BAD, PICK ME AND I MAKE TRUMP LOSE!”, there’s no effort to use his background as a blue collar dip from Scranton to appeal to other blue collar dip s from holes like Scranton
I don't know how anyone could view working with Republicans as anything but negative considering how they stole a Supreme Court seat by deciding it was ok for the Supreme Court to be an 8 person court. That's why I will 100% support court packing if the Democrats win the presidency and the senate. McConnell already set the precedent that there is no need for the Supreme Court to be 9 justices so he can ing live with it when he's not the one in power.
When Joe Biden says Republicans other than Trump are reasonable he’s simply ignoring realty. He had a front row seat to the 8 years of the unprecented obstruction McConnell exhibited despite there being a clear mandate by the American people after 2008 to let Democrats run because Republicans and their deregulation were the ones who ed it up.
Pretty much. I still remember Grassley wanting to work with Obama on the ACA at first, since it was similar to the healthcare plan Grassley was part of as a GOP alternative to Clinton's promised healtcare bill when he got elected, until the GOP got their marching orders from McConnell and the Kochs that they had to resist everything scary negro did. Having a scary black man in the White House just drove the GOP off the ing deep end.
The creation of new US states shouldn't be ruled out either. Throwing Republican heads out of power and keeping them out for a spell has never been so important.
Meh I think they certainly used scary negro as a tool but they were already driving off the deep end. Matt Taibbi explained it really well years ago, but the Republican Party has a platform that s its voter base over. After 8 years of right wing politics leading to a ing economic crisis, they had no choice but to move further to the right and tell their base “THE PROBLEM IS THAT BUSH DIDNT GO FAR ENOUGH TO SHRINK GOVERNMENT!!!”, any other strategy would have been an inherent admission that right wing style deregulation doesn’t work....meanwhile ever since Clinton Democrats have taken the bait and simply followed them to the right every time they become more extreme, so it works out well for those who actually benefit from votingrepublican.jpeg when Republicans swing the country to the right, even if it means a 1996 or 2008 level skunker once every decade.
Agreed...the 600k population of Washington DC doesn’t get any senators but the heads in the Dakotas get 4.
People like trump
The base did did not turn out in 2018 when trump was not on ballot
you're both saying it's more important when the margins are closer.
counts.
Yes, every vote is more important when margins are slimmer. I never said otherwise. Great job!
You skipping over the cause of why they’re slimmer is what my point was, but you already knew that.
Right. I'm just sticking with my point, on which we all agree. Too bad it came down to that.
13% of republicans who primaried against mccain in 2008 either voted for obama (9%) or didnt vote (4%). cant find anything on the 2012 republican primary. if a candidate requires some anomalous amount of primary-voter support... then maybe its not right to blame that factor
Not convinced.
anyone responsible for this show.
but especially bernie bros!
Damn what a burn! An inbred jab with a passport crossover! Damn player!
With that horrible lisp of hers?
#StillWithHer
AaronY and ChumpDumper still salty
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)