It is all they have, i.e. to literally deny reality.
It is all they have, i.e. to literally deny reality.
Why not just cut the bull 20 questions routine and get right back to where we started and where you are trying to go with all this.
Ukraine was never threatened to have the funds withheld unless they dug up dirt on Biden. Maybe you can find someone else who wants to discuss events that never transpired, but I’m done with it.
Not really an answer. We are attempting to establish facts concerning what you yourself admit should be impeachable. Hard to do when you fail to offer any.
The question remains.
Ukraine is dependent on the US for military and economic support.
Was this aid suspended at any time? If so, when?
What I said should be impeachable didn’t happen. You are trying to connect dots that don’t exist.
feeling the heat
didnt look worried to me
didnt melt down like the traitor in chief either
lolololol
Durham is you new messiah now?
How many does that make?
He doesn't have to threaten. Asking is bad enough. Why does this continue to escape you?
“Russia, if you’re listening...”
ukraine.....
now china.....
he is shooting someone on fifth ave
and the DUCKS - of the world will blame the person with a bullet in their head!
Amerikkka!!!
Russian witness thrown from a window after his name was exposed by Trump Tower lobbyist
a witness who was taking part in a U.S. trial aimed at Russian corruption —
and who fell from a window to his death
— reportedly had his name exposed in emails connected to alleged
pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign operative Natalia Veselnitskaya.
point the finger directly at Veselnitskaya,
who met with Don Trump Jr. at Trump Tower in 2016 that became a major part of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian involvement in Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
“A cache of emails obtained by the Dossier Center,
which is a Russian opposition organization based in London,
exposes the depth of foreign asset entanglement in Trump’s America
at the precise moment that
the president’s dealings with Ukrainian officials threaten to pull the Department of Justice and State Department into an unseemly impeachment fight.”
“The emails cannot be independently verified by The Daily Beast via a digital signature but
elements contained within them including
cell phone numbers,
bank details, planning,
email addresses, and
hearing dates
can be confirmed by cross-checking with subsequent court papers, lobbyist filings and other reporting.”
shed light on Veselnitskaya’s lobbying and legal campaign against the Magnitsky Act
and appear to suggest that it may have been carried out in breach of another U.S. law and court orders,
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/russian-witness-thrown-from-a-window-after-his-name-was-exposed-by-trump-tower-lobbyist-emails/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1635
https://www.thedailybeast.com/natalia-veselniskaya-email-leak-exposes-trump-tower-russians-dirty-lobbying-operations?ref=home
Why have Trash and his mafiya, "forgotten", OBSTRUCTED, lied about their contacts with Russians and the Russian investigation?
Not really an answer.
We are attempting to establish facts concerning what you yourself admit should be impeachable.
Hard to do when you fail to offer any.
The question remains.
Ukraine is dependent on the US for military and economic support. 3rd time
Was this aid suspended at any time? If so, when?
why nobody in either party and elsewhere were not told about the suspension, and once known, they couldn't get the WH say anything about it.
Why were Trash and Julie Annie "investigating" Ukraine and not the FBI which is run by Trash appointee?
No, you are attempting to make your hypothetical situation a reality and and then expecting others to discuss it as such.
Why have Trash and his mafiya, "forgotten", OBSTRUCTED, lied about their contacts with Russians and the Russian investigation?
Trash is the worst nickname in history
What about Julie Annie?
it's pretty fitting
I"ll get there eventually. I have a feeling I am going to have to keep treating him like Cosmored for a while though. Sad!
[moved converstation to impeachment thread, where it should be-RG]
Last edited by RandomGuy; 10-04-2019 at 04:18 PM.
Alternately, for anyone else still paying attention:
All other things equal if someone is unwilling to answer a good faith question honestly, does that make someone more, or less likely to be generally telling the truth?
Is that another boutons special?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)