Latest Spurs Trade Rumors Before the 2022 NBA Draft

[spurs10]

As usual I appreciate timvp's great article. I'm really excited about this draft and wonder who the Spurs are targeting. Since I don't know a lot about the players I'm leaning on the comments here...all ears here. On paper Mathurin caught my attention.

[rascal]

If all it takes to get Ivey is KJ and the 9th pick then you do that deal. We are using KJ wrong anyways so his fit on the team isn’t even that good. It does suck to lose a 40% 3 point shooter in him but hey that’s why you trade for Hayward. He slides right into the SF position and gives us shooting. But Ivey is a player that needs to be drafted by us in order to be successful. If he goes to Sac then his career is screwed. We can make a of a player out of Ivey

I don't know why the Spurs did not make that trade. What are they expecting to give up for the 4th pick?

[CGD]

It would be hilarious if all this Deing smoke was to get OKC to panic and trade up to 8 to snag him, so that the Spurs can get their guy, Dyson Daniels, to fall to them at 9.

[SAGirl]

Teams like CHA dont want to waste another year. They took a step back and fired a coach because of it. Does it make the most sense? Maybe not, but when a team signals who they are, I tend to believe them.

Even if its not exactly Jakob for pick 13, just something like that. Maybe its Jak + 25 for 13 and a future pick or something.

We'll see what happens. I don't buy that as much as you do, specially if the Spurs don't soften up. There are options is my point. Cant give up a ton for a one year of Jakob.

[rascal]

Teams like CHA dont want to waste another year. They took a step back and fired a coach because of it. Does it make the most sense? Maybe not, but when a team signals who they are, I tend to believe them.

Even if its not exactly Jakob for pick 13, just something like that. Maybe its Jak + 25 for 13 and a future pick or something.

How about Jak + 20 for 13 and a lottery protected future first?

[LkrFan]

[CGD]

I don't know why the Spurs did not make that trade. What are they expecting to give up for the 4th pick?

I think its more about having frameworks/deals in your back pocket ready to go if the chips fall a certain way the day of. If I'm SAC I want to be damn certain that Ivey doesn't jump one of the consensus top 3 guys giving me a shot at Banchero or Chet at 4.

[rascal]

It would be hilarious if all this Deing smoke was to get OKC to panic and trade up to 8 to snag him, so that the Spurs can get their guy, Dyson Daniels, to fall to them at 9.

OK City doesn't want Dieng. If they trade up its for Sharpe.

[SAGirl]

How about Jak + 20 for 13 and a lottery protected future first?

Spurs aren't doing Jak +20, they want Jak for 3 assets, two of which are first round picks. Maybe they soften up to two assets, that is more doable. I don't think it happens though, I suspect Charlotte gets cold feet and just drafts a center.

[T Park]

I still think James Wiseman for Poodle plus a first round pick makes sense for both teams.

Yuck

[SAGirl]

I think its more about having frameworks/deals in your back pocket ready to go if the chips fall a certain way the day of. If I'm SAC I want to be damn certain that Ivey doesn't jump one of the consensus top 3 guys giving me a shot at Banchero or Chet at 4.

That, plus there is a scrum for that pick still. Other teams are also throwing assets at them.

[T Park]

OK City doesn't want Dieng. If they trade up its for Sharpe.

Lmfao. Literally the only person on earth that likes sharpe at this point. The guy is a damn peanut head.

[CGD]

Jrue was basically filler and 3 FRP

[lmbebo]

So 1-2 players, 2 future 1st round picks and a pick swap?

[DPG21920]

Da Fuk???

Dis is not what I meant when I said trade for Collins lmao

[DPG21920]

We'll see what happens. I don't buy that as much as you do, specially if the Spurs don't soften up. There are options is my point. Cant give up a ton for a one year of Jakob.

I agree with you overall - was just making a framework of how Jak ends up netting a lottery pick (even if not likely)

[eDizzle20]

I'm not sold on trading Jakob. He has progressed nicely every season. Yeah, he's going into the last year of his contract, but I don't think you trade him just because he's gonna command too much money next offseason. He's an excellent rebounder and very good defender. Unless the Spurs have an offer they can't refuse I don't see it. With that being said I'm all for the best available player. Based on all the prospects and the players that are going to be legitimately available I see it as Sharpe, Davis, Sochan. I like the though of EJ Liddell at no. 20. He would fill the PF position that the Spurs need to address in this draft.

[Mr. Body]

Da Fuk???

Dis is not what I meant when I said trade for Collins lmao

Yeah I'm pretty confident Jake Fischer pulled that right out of his rectum.

[jjspur]

Sharpe and Dieng = bad picks for the spurs.
Duren or Sochan = better picks
Davis or Daniels = probable pick

If Duren, Sochan, or Daniels falls the spurs should jump on it. Davis should be there if the rest are already taken.

[scott]

Gross. #20 for Collins seems more like market price after the Grant trade.

[NASpurs]

probably explains DJ's cryptic message

[rascal]

Lmfao. Literally the only person on earth that likes sharpe at this point. The guy is a damn peanut head.

You must not visit other team's sites because this site is the only one who doesn't want Sharpe that I've seen.

[slick'81]

Da Fuk???

Dis is not what I meant when I said trade for Collins lmao

beyond re ed

[exstatic]

Sales 101. Set the price high enough, and meet at the middle.

Let the bidding war begin

So many people fail to understand this primary pillar of negotiations.

[AFBlue]

Would they also have a deal to jump up and get Ivey?