Reply With Quote
So, you're saying they're crying their asses off for more unreliable tests?
It's not necessarily the testing which is my point. If you're looking for an absence of something, usually by molecular binding or lack thereof, then sample handling, sample prep and lab conditions are critical to avoid introduction of that missing element somewhere along the way. It's much easier to detect the presence of something than the absence of something, which is what most 2nd tier tests do - they look for the precursor.
So, you're saying they're crying their asses off for more unreliable tests?
What's in the article is pneumonia first. Two false negatives second. Covid positive test later third.
What you're doing is called conjecture. There's a reason it doesn't hold up in court. Bull ters like you would have a field day if it did.
Straw man.
I have no idea what you're rambling about, blekeFor what it's worth, he did chime in once with a
I was gonna post it; but I would've had to through the better part of the 978 pages of Trump Is Doing Awesome thread to find it.
You don't need to know to be Chump's chihuahua anyhow. Get in here and shrilly bark some. Chump really needs you right now.
People need to stop exercising right now!
Great. I'll find another that clears it up.
Cordero, 41, began feeling unwell over a month ago, but his symptoms were all over the place. On March 31, Kloots wrote that he had been admitted to an ICU because he was "having a hard time breathing" after being misdiagnosed with pneumonia. Two false-negative COVID-19 tests steered them wrong, but a third confirmed that he had the potentially deadly virus.
https://extratv.com/2020/04/11/broad...inst-covid-19/
And another:
She said Cordero had actually tested negative for the virus twice after being admitted to the intensive care unit with what seemed to be pneumonia over a week ago.
But doctors still believed it was coronavirus and did a third test, which came back positive.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/corona...eles-1.4885007
Do you understand now?
Yes or no.
Those type of life-threatening symptoms for a healthy Broadway actor? Just as the result of COVID-19?
Very low probability. Journalists and score keeper alike are incentivized to just write anything and everything away to COVID-19 in as much as possible.
Not so ironically, Dr. David Dump has the same motivation.
dunnoderp incentivized to make up moar conspiracy theories.Those type of life-threatening symptoms for a healthy Broadway actor? Just as the result of COVID-19?
Very low probability. Journalists and score keeper alike are incentivized to just write anything and everything away to COVID-19 in as much as possible.
Not so ironically, Dr. David Dump has the same motivation.
Dude was diagnosed with pneumonia right off, Chump. Guess what:
sepsis is most often associated with pneumoniaDesperate Doctor David Dump
Feel free to post your stories that discount the ones I posted.
Doctors suspected he had COVID-19 from the start.Dude was diagnosed with pneumonia right off, Chump. Guess what:
Guess what?
doctors still believed it was coronavirus and did a third test, which came back positive.
Way ahead of you dog.
You're the one going full Chihuahua on my ankle about something you think I might have said in a thread long ago.You don't need to know to be Chump's chihuahua anyhow. Get in here and shrilly bark some. Chump really needs you right now.
But in derp bizarro world, you biting my ankles means I'm biting yours.
You can try and spin all day.
Was the pneumonia a misdiagnosis?
Yes or no.
J Smith brought you up. I laughed at you. Call it what you want.
As a cuckold you should be pretty used to being laughed at at this point.
No.
They proved it was COVID-19 pneumonia.
Not if "was" refers to when he was admitted to the hospital. In fact, it was proven by two negative tests that that was not so.
LOL dump
He showed symptoms of pneumonia.
The doctors suspected it was COVID-19 pneumonia.
The doctors confirmed it was COVID-19 pneumonia after two false negative tests.
Still pneumonia
Don't try to downplay the facts. He was diagnosed with pneumonia, not merely showed symptoms.
He then tested false for COVID-19 TWICE.
They took the precaution of testing regardless of the extent of su ions. That's just smart medicine.
As it stands, you have zero proof that he had COVID-19 before being admitted. ZERO.
In fact, you do have two pieces of evidence that suggest he did not have COVID-19 upon being admitted.
You have no evidence it was days later.
He showed symptoms of pneumonia.
The doctors suspected it was COVID-19 pneumonia.
The doctors confirmed it was COVID-19 pneumonia after two false negative tes
You want to focus on evidence:
Diagnosis upon being admitted: Pneumonia
Two tests for COVID-19: Negative
Anything you want to say counter to the veracity of these facts is conjecture at best.
Battleship sunk, .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions