Reply With Quote
"Conspiracy theory"
It's been explained, brah.
[QUOTE=Spurtacular;9115749]Is that supposed to be my viewpoint?/QUOTE]It was what you claimed. If your conspiracy theory is different, explain it.
"Conspiracy theory"
It's been explained, brah.
And you don't think it's a conspiracy theory?"Conspiracy theory"
It's been explained, brah.
Brah?
'Conspiracy theory' is a loaded term that the CIA popularized to diminish solid analysis as mere fringe thoughts. Frankly, more 'conspiracy theories' have merit than the dross the media shovels to us.And you don't think it's a conspiracy theory?
Brah?
And no, I would not qualify it as a conspiracy theory rather than solid analysis. And it's not even a fringe notion that presidential ratings go up with the advent of war or the prospect of war. So, the question you have to ask yourself is are Americans that blood thirsty; or does the media push a narrative that propels the military complex?
You have a theory.
About a conspiracy.
Americans tend to rally round the flag. Especially those who would compare Robert E. Lee to Obi-Wan Kenobi.
He will handle it.
It will be handled.
LOL "the media made it up"
You do realize there is a rather marked effect that sees leaders' approval tick up when they focus people on foreign enemies, right?
Feel free to provide a link showing evidence that this was "made up", as opposed to actually representative of underlying reality. Your claim, your burden of proof.
Literally, she didn't.Hillary Clinton's net worth is in the range of $11 million to $53 million, giving her an average net worth of $32 million with no apparent liabilities, according to federal records. Hillary says she and Bill Clinton were “dead broke” after they left the White House in 2001.Aug 29, 2016
You literally quoted the side bar from "Hillary Clinton's Net Worth".
While she's certainly not a billionaire, she's likely worth close to $100,000,000.
And LOL at her being almost dead broke. Surely you know the difference between her (or any other elite) being dead broke and a "normal" person.
You do realize that's exactly what I said, right? But that doesn't mean because the average American is for it. It means that the media advocates for the trillions dollar war industry.
2012 election, 2016 election.....
You think Gallup, the biggest polling outfit got out of presidential polling for why? Cos the establishment didn't want legitimate polls out there undermining their gaslighting efforts. Brah, fake news is the norm. I wouldn't try to convince you of . If you want to be willfully ignorant, that's not my problem.
And you know this because you go over Hillary's books? You keep up with all the offshore accounts?
As a matter of just a conservative estimate, she's a hundreds-millionaire. But this doesn't count all the dirty money. And frankly, I would think that her own personal assets are more than a billion.
So polling companies support the liberal dogma except when they don't.
And polling companies aren't legitimate unless they are.
Do you believe Gallup's poll tracking Trump's approval rating is legitimate?
Nope. It's political engineering.
OK, you need to make a flowchart describing your conspiracy decision process because you are making zero sense.
I watched week after week, Obama ing up and his approval rating not dipping below 39. The second their was a modi of good news, his approval rating would jump to 46. It can't even be said that this is because Obama has a loyal base, because statistical variation is an inevitability. I didn't go to college so that I could just chuck what I learned. I know rigging when I see it.
Could everyone stop talking to spurtacular? I think everyone agrees he's a complete moron. Maybe he'll stop posting if you stop responding.
It' eventually becomes boring ing stupid people, right?
It's just so funny when someone is so completely wrong and so sure he's right.You do know this isn't a measure of your personal approval of a president, right?
You know this is a ty rebuttal, right?
It's a serious question. The polls didn't go the way your emotions wanted, so you concluded they were fake.
No, it wasn't. It was . You're just arguing something I'm not saying cos you're piling on .
See, you're still all emotional about it. Once you accept that not everyone thinks like you and you are not always right, you can really function in a society. Otherwise you're Trump without the money.
I'm not emotional, whatsoever. If you're argue dumb that I wasn't arguing, then it's not something I'll devote energy to, chump.
There's no other way to explain your argument. Outliers and biases aside, the basic trends in well constructed polls are proved and repeated by the many disparate polling companies that put the work in. You say they are because, well, because you say so. It's a lazy and arrogant argument that is easily dismissed. You haven't devoted any energy to this at all.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
