This is deserves its own thread. Have a felling this might actually happen. Spurs must know something we don't
I don't know how I feel about this now that it actually might happen.
It's Parker or Green, and they certainly aren't moving the former
idk man i'm cool with losing him for CP3 but not if it's just for Hill.
It's not Parker. It's always been Green.
Bad, bad move imo
Lol thought the same yet some people here think they would trade Parker. I personally think this means they prefer to keep Simmons under the right cir stances
interesting. it doesn't mean a CP3 acquisition but it certainly indicates there is a plan A to....Z strategy in place. Again, it's chaos theory. There are a lot of possible outcomes based on what happens initially.
Fukin Porker should do the honorable thing and sacrifice himself for the sake of the team.
worth looking into... he should have great value considering the rest of the contracts around the league.
Depends on what it's for. If we lose him and don't get Paul or another significant player, then I'd be pissed.. especially with how cap-friendly Green's contract is. But something tells me PATFO have a plan..
It's been two playoffs in a row.
If he goes Jefferson on us and thrives under a different playoff coach, oh well whadaya gonna do?
Trade him.
Definitely hurt more then helped the past two.
Sorry you got robbed out of 2013 Finals MVP. Be sure to thank Pop n Parker for that one last time.
ing loyalty , Parker's the one who should get the shaft especially if this is to get CP3. DG would flourish with CP3.
It's soo obvious.
Green was great in last year's playoffs, tbh..
I like George Hill, but did he really just put Hill and CP3 in the same sentence as an "or"?
If he would just up and retire, I would let you suck his man. And I'm serious: I'd let you do it. That would just be... it would just be great. Him retiring...
tmtcsc reading ST right now
Why not ing Parker ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)