Reply With Quote
No. You bring this up every. You depend on this insult and we have to see it, so give us the backstory on it.
don't worry pav. stay in your own lane.
No. You bring this up every. You depend on this insult and we have to see it, so give us the backstory on it.
The death of racism is greatly exaggerated in all quarters.
true or false: the south used to be a democrat stronghold
true or false: the south in recent years has become a republican stronghold
did the people of the south have a change of heart, or do you think those labels perhaps dont carry identical meanings now as they did 60 years ago (or 160 years ago, for people who still talk about muh party of lincoln)
put me on ignore. you don't have to see homie.
Why are you afraid to talk about your go-to insult?
why do you care so much? pavTHETIC i am really starting to personally dislike you. you're that kid no one wants to be a friend of.
you have a problem with anything i type here then put me on your ignore list and live the best life you can. now go yourself!
I don't have a problem with it.
I'm asking you about it.
You bring it up all the time and you shut down when I asked you a simple question. What is the matter with you guys getting all shy?
don't worry about it and stop making threads all about you and your dumb questions. move along.
DON'T EVER ASK ME ABOUT THINGS I BRING UP ALL THE TIME!
That's just stupid, dude.
Tantrum
it's easy pav... it doesn't concern you so stay the out of it. god damn you're so ing annoying. go play drama queen somewhere else you female.
so Spurtacular, what's your take on party realignment post 1965?
always... ugh
crutch word
Use lashing out and triggered next.
You're just as afraid to talk about things you bring up.
you demanded an answer from me; I gave you one.
what's your answer to this, Spurtacular?
true or false: the south used to be a democrat stronghold
true or false: the south in recent years has become a republican stronghold
did the people of the south have a change of heart, or do you think those labels perhaps dont carry identical meanings now as they did 60 years ago (or 160 years ago, for people who still talk about muh party of lincoln)
They don’t answer because they can’t. I doubt they know what a copperhead is/was
Nope. Try composing yourself and not throwing tantrums. You won't have to lash out if you do that.
Use lashing out and triggered next.
You're just as afraid to talk about things you bring up.
vy65: I think Spurtacular is capable of saying what he thinks but chooses not to.
Mixture of cowardice and guile behind that I would say. It seldom goes well for him he when he actually discloses topical opinions.
Playing the dozens is more his thing.
Actually, I didn't answer because he didn't quote to alert it. I can see why; his answer was pretty damn weak.
That's not composing yourself. That's just trying to put a happy face on your spazz.
how is it weak?
are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?
The Dems ran the an hesis of their platform and lost. I was mocking the hypocrisy of the "holier than thou" pla udes shown by the Democrat supporters because they voted for a Republican disguised as a Democrat while mocking the whole "we switched rhetoric so we inherit what the Republican party accomplished before we switched sides". Admittedly, more of a troll post because the word "Dixiecrat" was mentioned. I took my shot and it resonated. I still stand by Hillary being a racist and an affectionate fan of a KKK Grand Wizard and I laugh at the people who voted for her because she was a fraud the way people laugh at (and they should) people like me who thought Trump would be the "every man" candidate that politics needs. Instead of being bought by lobbyists, he was probably bought by a foreign enemy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
