Reply With Quote
Says the guy who gets shot out of the air, lands on his head, and then states he is fine.
fckn liar.
its a prime original, i'd check it out. good stuff and fairly historically accurate as well
Says the guy who gets shot out of the air, lands on his head, and then states he is fine.
fckn liar.
Called itIn other words this thread is going to die a very painful death
Nope...I caught Tapper today while eating lunch and he was still trying to spin the Russian bounty story
So Russia really did offer bounties on US troops? and paid them?
What part of the CIA officer didn’t have confidence in the intelligence are you having trouble understanding?
And more from Sec of Def
You fell for more Russia bull from the NYT, again.
So the DOD doesn't know.
But the CIA does?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/30/u...elligence.htmlAmerican officials intercepted electronic data showing large financial transfers from a bank account controlled by Russia’s military intelligence agency to a Taliban-linked account, evidence that supported their conclusion that Russia covertly offered bounties for killing U.S. and coalition troops in Afghanistan, according to three officials familiar with the intelligence.
Though the United States has accused Russia of providing general support to the Taliban before, analysts concluded from other intelligence that the transfers were most likely part of a bounty program that detainees described during interrogations.
You fell for the deflection from the written PDB.
"Muh Trump don't read no briefs" will be your fallback.
Investigators also identified by name numerous Afghans in a network linked to the suspected Russian operation, the officials said — including, two of them added, a man believed to have served as an intermediary for distributing some of the funds and who is now thought to be in Russia.
The intercepts bolstered the findings gleaned from the interrogations, helping reduce an earlier disagreement among intelligence analysts and agencies over the reliability of the detainees. The disclosures further undercut White House officials’ claim that the intelligence was too uncertain to brief President Trump. In fact, the information was provided to him in his daily written brief in late February, two officials have said.
So the afghans were in on it too. DUN DUN DUN.Afghan officials this week described a sequence of events that dovetailed with the account of the intelligence. They said that several businessmen who transfer money through the informal “hawala” system were arrested in Afghanistan over the past six months and were suspected of being part of a ring of middlemen who operated between the Russian intelligence agency, known as the G.R.U., and Taliban-linked militants. The businessmen were arrested in what the officials described as sweeping raids in the north of Afghanistan as well as in Kabul.
I can't wait for President Biden to give the Pootin a stern talking to
He definitely won't be arguing for Russia to be in the G7 between golf outings. or pulling troops out of German to make Putin happy, stupid mother er.
Trump defense on Russian bounty story falls flat, even with Republicans
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-defense...234205365.html
But for now... Trump is still president.
What the is your party leader going to do about it now?
His party leader is going to attack the whistleblowers instead of standing up to Putin like a man. Weak president.
He will challenge him to a push up battle
El hombre es menso
^ NYT wrote it so it must be true
If you don't know what it means, you don't belong on this forum.
You bend the knee yet?
Is their 3rd or 4th attempt?^ NYT wrote it so it must be true
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
