He did kill the mask mandate. Doesnt mean hes mandsting to NOT wear masks
cant even comprehend the difference
Understood.
Snow Joes are too cheap to not have up there.
He did kill the mask mandate. Doesnt mean hes mandsting to NOT wear masks
cant even comprehend the difference
Nope
Glad thats settled.
If the vaxed is infected hes much more dangerous than a healthy unvaxed
Cheers
Upset CRT was banned
You're still trying to salvage that ty argument
I've experimented with the same concept here several times and each time been told it's not a viable comparison by someone on the left. Funny they never said to you though
You dishonest assholes are hilarious.
"A sober driver is more dangerous than a drunk on his couch"
Why is the vaxxed less dangerous? Please explain.
What is CRT?
Good luck getting a coherent answer
less likely to contract covid to begin with
That's odd. My 100% vaxxed family all got it from another vaxxed person.
How does that link to being dangerous? Also, where's the data that supports that? I've only seen data that says you can still be infected but less likely to have severe symptoms.
So how does the unvaxxed person become dangerous and to whom, since you're less likely to contract COVID than them?
Keep moving that goalpost.
He did and you fell for it, got it.
Nothingburger as I originally said.
lol your hygiene
Do you know what "less" means?
Since no one quantified it, I'd say no. You can use that nebulous claim even if an entire football stadium of people, all vaxxed and boosted, got infected at the same time. Where's your standard?
My standard is math.
COVID MISSINFORMATION ALERT
(ref 28383hw)
Show your math. No cherry picking samples.
Active cases
Texas - 191K active cases
NY - 2,200,752 active cases
Vaccination rate;
Texas - 57.8%
NY - 73%
Math
because people who have contracted covid are the ones who can transmit it. this is how communicable diseases work.
umm, just about every clinical trial that was done with the vaccines? here's one for exampleAlso, where's the data that supports that? I've only seen data that says you can still be infected but less likely to have severe symptoms.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345
of course, variants like omicron are chipping away at the efficacy, but its still there, and similar research is out there with boosters
this is irrelevant. i dont care how much less likely i am to contract it than them. its not a compe ion i'm trying to win. i dont know how many times i've had to make this same point to youSo how does the unvaxxed person become dangerous and to whom, since you're less likely to contract COVID than them?
even if, for arguments sake, i was about 50% less likely to contract covid from Poster B (or insert any percentage of your choosing, though we know it is not 100% and we know it is not 0%)
a) if they have not contracted covid, they cannot transmit covid to me.
b) if they are unvaccinated, they are more likely to have contracted covid (and by extension, to transmit covid).
c) if a person does contract covid... unvaccinated people are likely to be sicker for longer periods of time, thereby increasing the duration of time when they can transmit covid (there is some mixed data here, but we can say that vaccinated people who contract covid, during the time they are sick, are about as likely as unvaccinated people to transmit it. thats why its crucial to decrease the period of time where one is sick)
d) if a sick person is unmasked (and they have covid), they are more likely to transmit covid to me than a sick person not wearing a mask
now you might have noticed that A-D are all true regardless of MY vaccination status. it's never just about me. its about the general public. that includes unvaccinated people too. it is irrelevant how likely I am vs person B when it comes to catching covid. somebody not taking precautionary measures puts himself, and by extension, others at an increased risk.
this is why the drunk driving analogy works. i am a sober driver. poster B is a drunk driver. i am less likely to get into a car accident than poster B in this state. nevertheless, poster B sharing the road with me puts me at a heightened risk of getting into an accident even though i have taken my necessary precaution (not drinking before getting behind the wheel).
Darrin's family sample ok, but scientific studies not ok?
Flunkee
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)