You knew that she would say the burden of proof is on you?
Wow.
you fell for it
I knew you were gonna do that, what a moron
You knew that she would say the burden of proof is on you?
Wow.
You are confronting and in a flame war with only the posters that are calling out chumpies cowardly snitching - and rightfully so -
You are declaring yourself as his defender - if not implicitly stating it - your actions are confirming this.
Maybe - it is time to stop denying it.
Published. (Sold well. Never claimed best-selling, re .) With an awesome sense of humor. Double fail.
And which "pblishing" house "pblished" your book of unfunny nicknames?
I knew she would be as stupid and desperate as you and take what i purposely gave her to see if she would use it to think she was being witty
She took the bait the same way you always do lol
But seriously, though... Who are you? And what did I do to get your panties so spectacularly in a twist?
Because I don't recall ever seeing you around here until a couple of weeks ago. And I'm almost certain I'd had zero interaction with you until you were all of a sudden joining in and insulting me. Which leads me to suspect you've done it only because it's what your new internet boyfriends were doing. Which is, honestly, one of the saddest and most pathetic things I've seen around here.
But you purposely gave her a demand for a burden of proof from you with which she could easily agree.
Oh you know!
Isn't this interesting?
Not trolling or lying -
but this was my EXACT reaction when one day you came out of nowhere and were suddenly insulting me - even throwing out the "prison guard" barbs -
EXACTLY - my thought regarding the "pathetic" part.
Interesting how that works.
Now you know exactly how I felt - and I still never knew what got your panties in a twist against me.
lol - you get what you pay for -
And perhaps it's time to acknowledge that not everyone else is as preoccupied with Chump as you so clearly are.
I'm posting in this thread because I think the arguments you and SA210 are making are stupid. I would be here no matter who those arguments were against.
Did you post these thoughts?
Link?
Burnt mecco?
^disingenous retort ^ dishonest ^
Oh, CF.
You have made some very powerless enemies today.
Come to think of it - I probably did as I was baffled - but I cannot remember which thread it was.
Since you live here - maybe you could find it.
Your claim. Your burden of proof.
Just like the troll names you claim I used with you.
Your gonna back down from this one too.
the crunchy stuff
^just not interested in finding it^
THE BACKDOWN
You claimed you had at least two other troll accounts, your burden of proof to name them, after you answer why you take the forum too seriously as to be at almost 80,000 posts. Now squirm, snitch
So you think I have none?
OK.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)