Wait... Wino called you a pompous ass for pointing out your misspelling of tenet? Forget the avuncular lecture... you're maybe a . Sorry I lectured you on other people being s... it may just be you. Honestly... what's your problem? Sorry if my condescending similes fall shortHijo de su... thanks for reminding me this board is a nest of venomous, bat- s. ing ! Adieu, puto
You admit to being condescending but when I come back the same I get this?Wait... Wino called you a pompous ass for pointing out your misspelling of tenet? Forget the avuncular lecture... you're maybe a . Sorry I lectured you on other people being s... it may just be you. Honestly... what's your problem? Sorry if my condescending similes fall short
Nice meltdown though.
Argumentative. We all are I guess, but we don't all equally suc b to ishness.
Some posters won't even let you agree. Boutons is the absolute worst on this count.
Fuzzy personalizes everything.
That's not peculiar to his trend of posting -- it's rather common.
total aside, but if there were a taboo in this sub-region of ST -- and there very nearly is -- it's agreeing with other posters openly.Some posters won't even let you agree. Boutons is the absolute worst on this count.
Last edited by Winehole23; 01-29-2016 at 04:00 AM.
the reluctance is totally understandable however, agreement is expressed in words far less frequently than it occurs.
agreement is tacit, controversy is loud.
agreement is underrated because it doesn't make as much noise.
....
a lie goes around the world six times before the truth gets out of bed and ties its shoes, or something like that
pace, Fuzzy, on correcting the tenant/tenet malaprop.
be real: you didn't misspell it. you used the wrong word.
it isn't personal -- it happened far less frequently in the past, so it bothers me more now.
those damn nyms. it's quibbling over semantics; how droll. my interest is in clear communication not in who communicates 'correctly.'
you were just commenting on how I personalize everything. Then you surrep iously claim what you do is not personal. Claim that I'm pompous and then come at me with base pedantry.
you are talking to me directly and criticizing me. what a pathetic smear campaign.
you're very obviously being unreasonable when you say it's not personal. Your sentence structure indicates a direct comment on me. you've gone straight ad hominem on several accounts besides. you likely get reflexively mad when you read my posts.
Why you pickin' on me, ?
Why you pickin' on me, ?
but they're not. one has a second n, and it isn't silent.those damn nyms.
don't see another backpedal from here, best to quit while you're behind.
I did it for the LOLZWhy you pickin' on me, ?
John Kasich Poised To Sign Bill That Uses Discredited Evidence To Defund Planned Parenthood
Ohio’s legislature passed a bill on Wednesday to effectively defund Planned Parenthood by redirecting state-administered grants away from groups that “promote abortion.” The legislation now heads to the desk of Gov. John Kasich, who has vowed to sign it into the law.
The bill was created after the Center for Medical Progress released its attack videos last summer which claimed that the organization was selling “aborted baby parts.” The lawmakers who authored the legislation used the videos as the main evidence for defunding the largest women’s health organization, even after Ohio’s attorney general cleared the state’s Planned Parenthood clinics of any unlawful acts.
A number of other states are also attempting to pass measures to defund Planned Parenthood, but Ohio’s bill could be particularly disastrous. Women’s health advocates say the bill’s vague wording could unintentionally prevent major health departments in Ohio’s most populated areas from accessing these funds for all forms of care — not just abortions — and could ban major Ohio insurers from covering any other health services simply based on the fact that they also cover abortion.
By cutting off any programs that provide abortions, the legislation also targets programs that screen for cancer, support mothers through pregnancy, and educate teens about domestic violence. Instead, the funds will be redirected to other providers, including dentist’s offices and school nurses, which do not perform these vital services.
Despite pressure from public health advocates, Ohio voters, and the New York Times, Kasich has remained committed to seeing the bill through into law.
“If they want to raise money, they can still do it,” Kasich told a voter in Iowa last month when he promised to sign the bill. “I’m going to sign a bill to defund it, so you shouldn’t be confused.”
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2016...n-legislation/
Repugs hide in the herd of chicken , anti-intellectal, anti-science, Bible humping (lip service), misogynist assholes, every single one of them.
Kasich isn't moderate, only moderate-sounding. His governorship has been as radical and extremist as TX.
Kentucky lawmaker’s bill would require men to get a note from their wives to purchase Viagra
Fed up with laws restricting a woman’s right to choose, a Kentucky lawmaker has proposed new restrictions on men wanting to obtain erectile dysfunction drug Viagra, saying she was doing it “to protect these men from themselves.”According to the Courier-Journal, Rep. Mary Lou Marzian, a Louisville Democrat, is sponsoring House Bill 396 in an effort to protect men’s health and ensure they are completely informed about a drug with potentially dangerous side effects.
Under Marzian’s bill, only married men would be able to obtain the drug and it would require “a man to make a sworn statement with his hand on a Bible that he will only use a prescription for a drug for erectile dysfunction when having sexual relations with his current spouse.”
According to the lawmaker, who is also a nurse, “This is about family values.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/kent...e+Raw+Story%29
Texas Senators Consider ‘Wrongful Birth’ Law
The term refers to a Texas law that allows parents of a child born with severe defects to bring forward a “wrongful birth” negligence claim against their doctor if they feel they were not adequately warned about fetal health conditions. Parents who succeed in the civil process are en led to monetary damages to cover the lifetime costs of raising their disabled child.
Joe Pojman, director of the anti-abortion lobby group Texas Alliance for Life, told the Senate committee that the law sends the message that a child “would have been better off had he or she been aborted.”
Pojman also said the claim makes doctors liable for “a disability they did nothing to cause,” and told senators that it encourages medical professionals to “promote abortion to avoid liability,” a concept the organization has likened to “eugenic abortions.”
“Wrongful birth” has its roots in a 1975 Texas Supreme Court case brought forward by a woman whose child was born with disabilities after her doctor did not tell her that she had rubella, which is known to cause serious birth defects, while she was pregnant. Nationally, about half of the states recognize “wrongful birth” claims.
Reproductive rights advocates said that eliminating the “wrongful birth” legal claim could rob Texans of the ability to make their own decision about whether to carry a potentially troubled pregnancy to term, or to terminate.
Susan Hays, a longtime abortion rights advocate and attorney, told the Observer she fears a scenario where “a doctor who’s anti-abortion not telling a family there are birth defects, or downplaying them, and they have a child who suffers horribly.”
http://www.texasobserver.org/texas-s...ful-birth-law/
http://www.texasobserver.org/texas-s...ful-birth-law/
Texas Health Official Forced Out For Study That Criticized Planned Parenthood Cuts
The director of research at the Texas Health and Human Services Commission was nudged into early retirement after co-authoring a study that criticized the state cutting Planned Parenthood’s funding. The study suggested those cuts were damaging women’s healthcare statewide, which is true, and which several other studies have also found.
Texas lawmakers got extremely angry at Rick Allgeyer, a state employee for over 20 years, over this study, which he authored with researchers from the health commission and UT Austin’s Texas Policy Evaluation Project.
The study was published in early February in the New England Journal of Medicine (you can read the abstract here).
It concluded that cutting Planned Parenthood out of the Texas Women’s Health Program wasn’t such a hot idea, lowering the number of women who were able to get IUDs and raising the number of births covered by Medicaid.
http://jezebel.com/texas-health-offi...ium=socialflow
Texian Repug racist, misogynist War on (brown, black) Vaginas, and The Truth, rages full throttle.
John Oliver lays bare the South’s abortion-clinic nightmare: “Mississippi now has four times as many S’s as it does abortion clinics”
http://www.salon.com/2016/02/22/john...rtion_clinics/
AL's War on N!gg@ Wimmen is as intense as in the 19th century
Alabama GOP Makes Another Push to Regulate Abortion Clinics Like Sex Offenders
Two anti-choice bills have gained traction in the Alabama state legislature this month. One seeks to regulate abortion clinics in the same manner as sex offenders, and the other would require physicians who provide abortion care to disclose information about their personal finances to patients.
SB 205, sponsored by state Sen. Paul Sanford (R-Huntsville), would prohibit the Alabama Department of Public Health from issuing or renewing a health center license to an abortion clinic or reproductive health center located within 2,000 feet of a public school, regulating abortion clinics in the same manner as registered sex offenders.
HB 183 would require that the physician provide the patient with a conflict of interest disclaimer that would disclose the physician’s personal financial information.
Among the financial information the physician would be required to disclose: gross income from the previous fiscal year, percentage of income obtained from providing abortion services, and a statement “concerning the monetary loss to the abortion provider which would result from the woman’s decision to carry the pregnancy to term.”
http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/20...ality+Check%29
^boutons still the only one here who uses that sort of de able language to describe people of color
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
