Just show us the pics from Brazil, fold.
Foldren stuck in a fold.
Sorry this is happening to you.
Just show us the pics from Brazil, fold.
Big Pharma could supply the whole world with a COVID vaccine.
They've chosen not to
The pandemic could end soon for rich countries — but not for developing ones. This is Big Pharma's doing
Now, as these vaccines inch closer to the finish line, I am once again fearful that how we choose to ramp up manufacturing —
and who we decide should be first in line to receive the vaccine — is revealing a darker side of humanity.
For starters, many vaccine doses have already been
pre-pledged
to rich countries.
The Trump administration awarded Moderna and Pfizer billion-dollar contracts in exchange for 100 million doses of their vaccine.
human rights groups have reported that
82% of Pfizer's vaccine supply has already been purchased by a handful of rich countries representing 14% of the global population;
for Moderna, 78% of the doses have been pre-purchased for 12% of the population.
if governments were serious about reaching everybody on the planet,
they could force the pharma companies receiving these billion-dollar contracts to relinquish all patent rights.
Not only has this not happened, but the pharma companies are pulling out all the stops to make sure it won't.
the WHO started the COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP),
which includes the Open Covid Pledge, whereby businesses can donate their patents, technology and know-how to help fight the pandemic.
no pharma company developing a COVID-19 vaccine has voluntarily contributed to the Open Covid Pledge.
This includes not only the patents to the vaccines,
but also to all the supporting technology around delivering the vaccines.
Moderna is exceptional so far in the COVID vaccine race because they have said
they will waive all patent rights during the course of the pandemic.
The governments and health bodies (looking at you, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) that bankrolled these pharma companies with billions of dollars had a choice.
They could have stipulated clearly and transparently in their contracts with these drug companies that
all patents for COVID-19 are to be publicly owned and available to all.
They could have —
they just chose not to.
https://www.salon.com/2020/11/21/big-pharma-could-supply-the-whole-world-with-a-covid-vaccine-theyve-chosen-not-to/
Bwahahahahahahahhahahahhagahahaha
So triggered you asking for personal information
Lmao Personal? Just take a ing picture at the beach you dumb old got.
Loloooloookoooooookooklll TimDunkem bwahahjajahajahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhah ahahaahahahahahahhahahahahahhaahahahahaahhahahahah ahhahahahahahhaahahagauhushsuusususu
Hahahahhaahahahajah
What a loser
TimDunkem still responds.
He's my bizzle
Never was in Australia.
Foldren is still folding and is the designated forum fizzle.
TimDunkem bwhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahaha
Cried by he thought he had covid. Bout to bump
Folden has followed me since 2016 when he was claiming he had more skill in HS pre-3pt line upstairs in the Spurs forum.
Follows me around for years but now complains about me actually responding. What a fold.
Also never went to Brazil.
Covid-19: Oxford University vaccine is highly effective
Interim data suggests 70% protection, but
the researchers say the figure may be as high as 90% by tweaking the dose.
the Oxford jab is far cheaper, and is easier to store and get to every corner of the world than the other two.
So the vaccine will play a significant role in tackling the pandemic, if it is approved for use by regulators.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55040635
Does not require special refrigeration is a plus.
nasal spray as prophylaxis
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...645v1.full.pdf
The drug aprotinin inhibits entry of SARS-CoV2 in host cells
the protease inhibitor aprotinin can inhibit virus replication by preventing SARS-CoV2 entry into host cells.
Moreover, aprotinin appears to compensate for a SARS-CoV2-induced reduction of endogenous protease inhibitors in virus-infected cells.
"Our findings show that aprotinin is effective against SARS-CoV2 in concentrations that can be achieved in patients.
In aprotinin we have a drug candidate for the treatment of COVID-19 that
is already approved for other indications and
could readily be tested in patients."
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea...-tda112320.php
After Admitting Mistake, AstraZeneca Faces Difficult Questions About Its Vaccine
Some trial participants only got a partial dose of AstraZeneca’s vaccine.
Experts said the company’s spotty disclosures have eroded confidence.
AstraZeneca and Oxford “get a poor grade for transparency and rigor when it comes to the vaccine trial results they have reported,”
AstraZeneca has acknowledged a key mistake in the vaccine dosage received by some study participants,
adding to questions about whether the vaccine’s apparently spectacular efficacy will hold up under additional testing.
the error and
a series of other irregularities and omissions in the way AstraZeneca initially disclosed the data have
eroded their confidence in the reliability of the results.
the results were not clear.
It was the head of the flagship federal vaccine initiative — not the company — who first disclosed that
the vaccine’s most promising results did not reflect data from older people.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/25/b...ca-oxford.html
Bwahahahahhahahajajajajjajajahahah
He needs a vax to feel safe
Foldren folds.
Of the vaccines so far, its probably the best
Folks seem to talk out of their asses
Like getting disinfectant into the body
Probably do the same with nasal cleanse 1 part baby shampoo to 100 part water
AstraZeneca getting their own protocol wrong and half-dosing 2700 patients by accident isn't a confidence builder, I guess we'll see how it all shakes out.
​https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/23/...rly-data-show/If a final analysis, conducted after the inclusion of additional data, concludes the vaccine’s actual efficacy is around 70%, that could be a problem.
“If it’s 70%, then we’ve got a dilemma,” said Fauci. “Because what are you going to do with the 70% when you’ve got two [vaccines] that are 95%? Who are you going to give a vaccine like that to?”
The problem was also flagged in an analysis by Geoffrey Porges of the investment bank Leerink. “We believe that this product will never be licensed in the US,” Porges wrote.
Fauci cautioned that full datasets — which the Oxford researchers said they intend to publish in a scientific journal — need to be pored over before conclusions can be drawn.
You're pulling my leg, right?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)