Reply With Quote
Truth hurts you, amirite, REMF?
nOt goNNa poSt mUh soUrce bUt yoU laZy.
I think you just regurgitate you hear on talk radio
Truth hurts you, amirite, REMF?
Exactly.
It has nothing to do with being "ashamed"
If something really interests you enough, Google is right there.
Looks like you don't know how to recognize capitulation either.
Maybe you should read more.
I think you are a pathetic loser and I dont do talk radio or TV.
And anyone who reads your claim can just dismiss it as bull . Which it looks like is the case here. No skin off my back.
I think you're an insecure attention that listens to talk radio. Now what.
Whatever makes you feel better, Loser.
Does it make you feel better to call me a loser with a capital L? I think it does.
Whatever makes you feel better, Loser.
either you're ashamed of your source or you don't have one, which is ok too.
LOL @ Whinehole and Bluck inventing forum "rules".
no rules, it's just basic courtesy and competence to credit your sources.
"Argument: Claims, Reasons, Evidence
Critical thinking means being able to make good arguments. Arguments are claims backed by reasons that are supported by evidence."
https://www.comm.pitt.edu/argument-c...asons-evidence
It's not a forum rule, it's an argument rule. If you want to post bull , name call and run away here in this forum, nobody's telling you not to. It's that simple, cowcuck.
You lazy s have honestly never read anything about pro/cons to ranked voting?
You spend two ing pages whining that I won't give you links to something that simple? How ing pathetically lazy.
lazy loser Bluck too lazy to use Google.
I mean the internet is pretty big and linking the specific article is really easy.
Why not just do that?
Why should I? This is ridiculous. This all started as a discussion on ranked voting. I pointed out both sides of the issue. There was no "argument" at all until ankle biting loser Bluck decided to make a big deal about links, like finding information about ranked voting is so ing difficult.
It's easy and courteous.
If you were just recalling the stuff on the fly and couldn't remember the source, just say so.
You didn't have to escalate and prolong the conflict.
Hey it's fine. You posted bull . No problem. Moving on.You lazy s have honestly never read anything about pro/cons to ranked voting?
You spend two ing pages whining that I won't give you links to something that simple? How ing pathetically lazy.
You pointed out a side that I haven't seen or found. Like I said, no problem, it's bull , moving on.
Glad you finally gave it up, Bluck. There was never an argument.
Lol. There was never an argument because you avoided the few pointed questions itt.
Bluck wasn't asking any questions, just trying to start when the there wasn't anything there. Typical Bluck. Not surprised you joined the dog pile though.
Lol "dog pile". Does calling me Bluck make you feel better in yet another thread where you're getting piled on? I think it does.
I knew it was bull from the start. Like I said I'm fine with calling it a post and leaving it there but you couldn't do that. Lol look at you now, you still can't.
I don’t think you made a very convincing argument against ranked choice voting.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
