Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36
  1. #1
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,652
    https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...ed/7816271001/

    Exceptions were made for people at the center of an interaction with police, anyone standing in an enclosed structure on private property where police activity was occurring and occupants of a vehicle stopped by police as long as recording in those instances didn't interfere with police actions.
    Here's what the cops will do they'll walk towards people filming them i.e. they are 10 feet but a cop will just walk 3 feet towards them. Also they'll tell passengers to stop filming them because its "interfering with their police action"

    An absolute flagrant violation of the first amendment, but none of the board republicans will care.

  2. #2
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    18,121


    Thin Blue Line

  3. #3
    Believe. daboom1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Post Count
    8,022

  4. #4
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    82,420

  5. #5
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,320
    8 feet seems reasonable. I could see a few idiots trying to get up close interfering with an arrest

  6. #6
    4-25-20 Will Hunting's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    22,315
    The 9th circuit will gut that law and doubtful that SCOTUS will overturn them.

  7. #7
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    82,420
    The 9th circuit will gut that law and doubtful that SCOTUS will overturn them.
    How would you like a 12-incher?

  8. #8
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,320
    The 9th circuit will gut that law and doubtful that SCOTUS will overturn them.
    Maybe. Looks like they were gonna try 15 feet at first but seemed to feel that 8 feet would be the right distance to get by the 1st amendment

  9. #9
    4-25-20 Will Hunting's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    22,315
    Maybe. Looks like they were gonna try 15 feet at first but seemed to feel that 8 feet would be the right distance to get by the 1st amendment
    The 8 feet rule wouldn't even be a big deal except for the part trainwreck described where the cops walk towards the person with the camera so there's no longer 8 feet of distance.

  10. #10
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    71,517
    8 feet seems reasonable. I could see a few idiots trying to get up close interfering with an arrest
    I agree
    The cop job is to protect the filmer and the person getting the free food

  11. #11
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    71,517
    The 8 feet rule wouldn't even be a big deal except for the part trainwreck described where the cops walk towards the person with the camera so there's no longer 8 feet of distance.
    Can not the criminal be moving trying to get away
    Do you think the cop will try to let criminal run as far as possible especially if he, she, it. Is using knife on people

  12. #12
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,320
    The 8 feet rule wouldn't even be a big deal except for the part trainwreck described where the cops walk towards the person with the camera so there's no longer 8 feet of distance.
    It'd be nice to have that exception explicitly implied but I'd bet the court would side with the photographer if that were found to be the case.

    And it's not like they're gonna be walking around with 8 foot measuring sticks.

  13. #13
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,320
    Can not the criminal be moving trying to get away
    Do you think the cop will try to let criminal run as far as possible especially if he, she, it. Is using knife on people
    Huh? Do you live close to Los Alamos, NM by any chance?

  14. #14
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    21 foot rule.

  15. #15
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    5,861
    i hope dumbass democrats test this rule and try to invade 8 feet on cops and see what happens,,,,

  16. #16
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,320
    i hope dumbass democrats test this rule and try to invade 8 feet on cops and see what happens,,,,
    A misdemeanor

  17. #17
    Take the fcking keys away baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    93,436
    The 9th circuit will gut that law and doubtful that SCOTUS will overturn them.
    Then Texas will do a copycat law that the 5th circuit will affirm in full.

  18. #18
    Kang Trill Clinton's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    20,429
    so they're going to infringe on my 1st amendment rights basically.

  19. #19
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    The framers didn't know cameras would be invented so isn't the 1st Amendment basically outdated? Do you really need an automatic shutter?

  20. #20
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,320
    so they're going to infringe on my 1st amendment rights basically.
    On the surface it seems like it, but honestly, I think the 8 foot rule should apply to everyone unless consent is given.

  21. #21
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,320
    The framers didn't know cameras would be invented so isn't the 1st Amendment basically outdated? Do you really need an automatic shutter?
    the cons ution is outdated unless 2nd amendment, huh

  22. #22
    Believe. daboom1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Post Count
    8,022
    so they're going to infringe on my 1st amendment rights basically.
    You can move to another state. I hear Chicago is poppin right now homey.

  23. #23
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,986
    You can still catch pigs mauling ppl at 8 foot so not a huge loss. Problem is the pigs can advance and advance and shorten the distance.

    I won5 be going to Assholezona anytime soon

  24. #24
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    the cons ution is outdated unless 2nd amendment, huh
    BoR isn't outdated, the left introduced the concept that it is. Don't choke on the sandwich.

  25. #25
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    You can still catch pigs mauling ppl at 8 foot so not a huge loss. Problem is the pigs can advance and advance and shorten the distance.

    I won5 be going to Assholezona anytime soon
    I won't be going around looking for cops to film in any state

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •