Or this just popped up on my Google feed.
Blake pimping Maggie Haberman's new book which he no doubt has on pre-order.
Or this just popped up on my Google feed.
A person stating their observation is not hearsay. That’s my point. That’s what the thread le and op are saying
You're saying he's right about his hearsay claim because he's a lawyer. Whether he's right or not has nothing to do with him being a lawyer, only whether or not there is hearsay in the OP. Yes, I am using it right. Sorry if you ed up and need a mulligan here.
Of course it's no longer important to you once you were shamed.
Judges in danger important again
No, I'm saying it's hilarious you agree that he's a lawyer, you're definitely not one, but you're arguing over they teach in lawyer 101.
I think he's right because I know what hearsay is, not because he's a lawyer, so no, not appeal to authority. Two different things going on here, but you're slow, par.
But you're not qualified to discuss this with me, so I wasn't arguing with you about it. No one gives a what you think.
Are you qualified? Is that why you went back and forth with me about it for several posts?
That's fine, get back to educating an actual lawyer what "hearsay" is. It's going well for you.
So you understood my comment about you not being qualified. Good. It wasn't meant as a slight against you. You are what you are, it's probably for the best.
So you didn't understand my question "are you qualified?"
That's a shame. You are what you are, derp.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)