Democrats Looking To Ramp Up The Fascism

[Spurtacular]

1) Is "materially interfere" a legal term or something you just made up?

2) What is the legal basis for your opinion?

They have an obligation to cooperate or to not obstruct their duties.

[Pavlov]

Ambivalent, as I just made the change. Go ahead and explicitly state that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization, or stand down.

What's ambivalent about sure?

Explain or back down again.

[Pavlov]

They have an obligation to cooperate

2) What is the legal basis for your opinion?

[Spurtacular]

so glad i stopped dealing with that ing ... you should try it yourself spurt and just ghost the loser from here on out. it's been a great 2 weeks on ST since...

Yea, but I routinely hand Chump his ass. Then when his Chumpettes have to sperm shield for him, it only gets funnier.

[Pavlov]

Yea, but I routinely hand Chump his ass.

Oh, give some examples.

This should be good.

[Spurtacular]

What's ambivalent about sure?

Explain or back down again.

The fact that it can just be considered a filler later on, or that you can say sure was responding to something else. You know this; that's why you do it (every time).

Go ahead and explicitly state that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization, or stand down.

[Pavlov]

The fact that it can just be considered a filler later on, or that you can say sure was responding to something else. You know this; that's why you do it (every time).

Like when?

Give some examples.

I'm calling bull .

[Spurtacular]

Oh, give some examples.

This should be good.

You think I do ent all your failures?

I wish I had that kind of time.

If I did, I'd have stuff like you calling yourself gay by multiple lines of your own logic.

[Pavlov]

You think I do ent all your failures?

I wish I had that kind of time.

If I did, I'd have stuff like you calling yourself gay by multiple lines of your own logic.

derp folds

[Spurtacular]

Like when?

Give some examples.

I'm calling bull .

Chump making demands for pretend w's / take off the heat. Par.

Go ahead and explicitly state that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization, or stand down.

[Pavlov]

Chump making demands for pretend w's / take off the heat. Par.

Go ahead and explicitly state that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization, or stand down.

Already did.

It is.

derp folds

Good talk.

Stay down.

[Spurtacular]

Already did.

It is.

derp folds

Good talk.

Stay down.

"Sure" is not explicitly.

Go ahead and explicitly state that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization, or stand down.

[Pavlov]

"Sure" is not explicitly.

Go ahead and explicitly state that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization, or stand down.

It is.

derp folds

[Spurtacular]

It is.

derp folds

That's not explicit either. More ambivalence. Par.

Go ahead and explicitly state that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization, or stand down.

[Pavlov]

That's not explicit either. More ambivalence. Par.

Go ahead and explicitly state that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization, or stand down.

I never said it wasn't.

I never will say it isn't.

It is cons utional.

I accept your folding forever on your baseless claim.

[Spurtacular]

I never said it wasn't.

I never will say it isn't.

It is cons utional.

I accept your folding forever on your baseless claim.

More ambivalence. Make a declarative stance that definitively supports your purported stance, or stand down.

In fact, I'll make it easy for you. If you agree, then just fill in the blank with the organizational en y at hand (while writing out the complete sentence), or stand down.

_____________ is a cons utionally ins uted organization.

[Pavlov]

More ambivalence. Make a declarative stance that definitively supports your purported stance, or stand down.

In fact, I'll make it easy for you. If you agree, then just fill in the blank with the organizational en y at hand (while writing out the complete sentence), or stand down.

_____________ is a cons utionally ins uted organization.

ICE is cons utional.

I'm not going to use your tortured vocabulary. It's stupid.

Now. What is the legal basis for your claim that local law enforcement is required to cooperate with ICE?

[Spurtacular]

ICE is cons utional.

I'm not going to use your tortured vocabulary. It's stupid.

Now. What is the legal basis for your claim that local law enforcement is required to cooperate with ICE?

You won't use the "tortured vocabulary" because you want the potential ambivalence of ICE is cons utional.

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov

Is ICE cons utionally ins uted?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

You won't use the "tortured vocabulary" because you want the potential ambivalence of ICE is cons utional.

Sorry, there is nothing ambivalent about the simple sentence "ICE is cons utional."

Explain how "ICE is cons utional" is ambivalent or back down again.

[Spurtacular]

Sorry, there is nothing ambivalent about the simple sentence "ICE is cons utional."

Explain how "ICE is cons utional" is ambivalent or back down again.

There's plenty of wiggle room to your mind. But if there isn't, then explicitly state that ICE is cons utionally founded.

[Pavlov]

There's plenty of wiggle room.

Like what?

Explain or back down again.

[Spurtacular]

Like what?

Explain or back down again.

There's plenty of wiggle room to your mind. But if there isn't, then explicitly state that ICE is cons utionally founded, or stand down.

[Pavlov]

There's plenty of wiggle room

Like what?

Explain or back down again.

[Hillary2020]

Stand-down order 0001 to Chump: Do not explicitly state that ICE is cons utionally founded.