Reply With Quote
And all of McCain's past associates are people who have committed financial fraud.
Your point Jochhe?
He doesn't associate with them now or share their views and opinions.
So I ask conservatives on here, what are you driving at? Tell me what you are trying to say with these attacks.
His past associates are Wright, Phlager, Rezco, Ayers, etc. He doesn't associate with them now for political expediency's sake <read: he threw them under the bus, not that they mind, they understand why he did it and I'm sure they approve>. Add to that the fact that he said he "chooses his friends carefully".
If you know anything at all about these characters, and you have basic comprehension skills, you should not have to ask what the point of the information is.
And all of McCain's past associates are people who have committed financial fraud.
Your point Jochhe?
We're asking anyway.
Just for kicks.
Tell us what the point is.
MANCHURIAN NEGRO!
McCain palls around with Charles Keating, G. Gordon Liddy and Henry Kissinger. Obama should make an ad playing up those associations.
Don't forget Joe Coors (funded the Contras) and sat on the radical U.S. Council for World Freedom board.
Spending 20 years in the congregation and not knowing what Wright's tirades were about would make him dumber than Bush
mccain thinks spain is the enemy.
"Spending 20 years in the congregation and not knowing what Wright's tirades were about would make him dumber than Bush"
Maybe HUSSEIN is smart enough to cherry pick the good, and ignore the goddamns?
that would make HUSSEIN smarter than everybody who swallows everything pitbull says as Gospel, you betcha.
You know, I do try to be open minded but this Sarah is really getting on my nerves.
I'm gonna need a link for that Buddy.
[QUOTE=JoeChalupa;2810069]You know, I do try to be open minded but this Sarah is really getting on my nerves.
is it because you can not get any of her's
Yeah, you can't get any of her nerves, Joe!
Or her mind!
Because he can't get any of her nerves?
Okay, just for kicks CD;
1. Obama insists that he chooses his friends carefully.
2. These carefully chosen friends are a mixed bag of criminals, anti-American radicals, bigots, extortionists, etc.
3. Obama terminates these friendships, or disowns his carefully chosen friends, only after their radical views and records become public knowledge, and they are inextricably tied to him. His disdain may have come across as genuine if he had distanced himself from them before they were outed, but by waiting until afterwards it was transparent that the “going there separate ways” was merely a guise, done only for the sake of political expediency.
4. Obama’s tenured relationship with this group of malcontents (aka, his carefully chosen friends) is evidence of like-minded philosophy.
5.Obama’s judgment is skewed to the degree that he has no business being the next POTUS.
For those that think highly of Ayers, Rezco, Phlager and Wright, there’s no problem, vote for the man that is tied into their philosophy through a willing and carefully association with them.
Obviously people who like him should vote for him, but know who he is before voting for him <or don't>.
Link to that quote? "I insist I choose my friends carefully."
A mixed bag of accusations, some baseless.2. These carefully chosen friends are a mixed bag of criminals, anti-American radicals, bigots, extortionists, etc.
The only one he terminated was the one with Wright, because Wright felt like digging his hole deeper.3. Obama terminates these friendships, or disowns his carefully chosen friends, only after their radical views and records become public knowledge, and they are inextricably tied to him. His disdain may have come across as genuine if he had distanced himself from them before they were outed, but by waiting until afterwards it was transparent that the “going there separate ways” was merely a guise, done only for the sake of political expediency.
No it isn't. Carville/Matalin. Schwarzenegger/Shriver. Myself/my brother.4. Obama’s tenured relationship with this group of malcontents (aka, his carefully chosen friends) is evidence of like-minded philosophy.
It's a nice stretch, but Obama hasn't damned America or bombed the Pentagon, so you're logic isn't logical.5.Obama’s judgment is skewed to the degree that he has no business being the next POTUS.
Your font size gimmick is stupid.For those that think highly of Ayers, Rezco, Phlager and Wright, there’s no problem, vote for the man that is tied into their philosophy through a willing and carefully association with them.
Obviously people who like him should vote for him, but know who he is before voting for him <or don't>.
What's the matter, do you have an aversion to the truth, Joe?
1. Did I post it as a quote?
2. Are you suggesting that the man who would be president doesn't choose his friends carefully?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...y-of-rhetoric/
I love it when you play captain obvious.A mixed bag of accusations,
which ones?some baseless.
Good CD, I didn't say he terminated them all.The only one he terminated was the one with Wright, because Wright felt like digging his hole deeper.
.No it isn't. Carville/Matalin. Schwarzenegger/Shriver. Myself/my brother
Hmmm, don't see any Phlager, Wright, Ayers or Rezco types listed there, not to mention that Obama was linked with 4 radicals (there are more, we'll save them for another time), not 1 family member.
FAIL!
He enjoyed the relationship with the man who asked God to Damn America (any links to where Obama spoke out against that outrage "before" his prez run?), to the degree that Wright presided over their Wedding and baptized their children.It's a nice stretch, but Obama hasn't damned America or bombed the Pentagon, so you're logic isn't logical.
Other than you, who suggested that he bombed America?
Your font size gimmick is stupid.That's all you have on the last quote?
Great putdown cd, seriously
Pick one of the two. Either Obama insists on it, or you insist on it. Which one is it?
You pick. I insist.
So, you really think it's a winning strategy to argue whether or not Obama actually said he picks his friends carefully?
Would you prefer it be proven that he didn't and, in fact, was pretty damn wreckless in picking those with whom he chose to associate?
Well, we're working on it.
You're so concerned about Obama's affiliations but I haven't seen you question John McCain's ties to Charles Keating or Joe Coors...funny.
Neither Keating or Coors are terrorists who wish they'd of killed more Americans when they had the chance.
Plus, McCain has answered for his association with Keating -- and was exonerated by the ethics committee.
I don't know anything about your Coors accusation.
hmmm... decisions, decisions...
Good to see you Joch... I thought you got lost somewhere!
I was pointing out an obvious contradiction on Joch's post. I really have nothing to argue about in this thread. I'm sure Obama had some weird people come hang around him, as much as Bush and McCain probably did/do too.
I don't really believe in guilt by association, but hey, if you do, more power to you!
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
