Also cited incorrectly in wiki due to citing IPCC propaganda:
Now here’s something that doesn’t take much deductive reasoning to see how they propagate misinformation.Chapter 9: Understanding and Attributing Climate Change:
Page 665:
As the increased density of greenhouse gasses ac ulate, the height of how much they warm is reduced as more IR is blocked sooner. That would be the working method of this theory is it is true.The observed pattern of tropospheric warming and stratospheric cooling is very likely due to the influence of anthropogenic forcing
Page 702-703:
Remember how I keep saying in some posts “with all other factors static.” Here is a perfect example. If CO2 and other greenhouse gasses remained constant, this would be the predicted result. However, they just said the increase in CO2 will cool the stratosphere. One is canceling out or overwhelming the other. Remember, the sun’s effect on the stratosphere is a direct on, but through three other layers first. Not radiative forcing. The increases are first off, going to affect the Exosphere, Thermosphere, and Mesosphere first, already absorbing nearly all the specific spectra of radiation that oxygen, ozone, etc. absorb. Temperature peaks around 50 km in the starting in the mesophere. Ozone first starts heating the atmosphere from incoming solar radiation at about higher than 60 km. It’s at a pretty low concentration until it starts rising at 75 km. Changes to the stratosphere would be very insignificant, as the higher layers of ozone and other gasses already trap the bulk of solar radiation.Models and observations also both show warming in the lower part of the atmosphere (the troposphere) and cooling higher up in the stratosphere. This is another ‘fingerprint’ of change that reveals the effect of human influence on the climate. If, for example, an increase in solar output had been responsible for the recent climate warming, both the troposphere and the stratosphere would have warmed.
Why is the stratosphere so cold? Because it is transparent to radiation both incoming and outgoing! Why would anyone in their right mind expect a notable measurable change? The troposphere is about 220 K (-53 C/-63 F) at 10 km and rises to about 270 k (-3 C/27 F) at its top.
Now before someone jumps to conclusions about the graphs, remember, radiative forcing from spectral vibrations is nearly logarithmic. It works very much like radioactive half-life. The incoming solar radiation heat is trapped more at the entry area than where it penetrates later. If you trap 50% of an incoming spectra at a specified O3 gas content, then there is only 50% remaining. The next equal O3 gas content then traps 25% (50% of 50%) of the radiation The next, 12.5%, etc...
Very little specific spectra left to make changes to O3 content in the stratosphere. The same theory why increased CO2 causes it to cool, means almost no changes from incoming solar increases.