Rightwing extremists: Danger Danger

**ChumpDumper** · 04-17-2009

No.

**Winehole23** · 04-17-2009

You're such a jackass, micca, and you have such a dirty mind. Did you ever learn to type with two hands?

**Cry Havoc** · 04-18-2009

Originally Posted by hope4dopes

I don't know man maybe that's why you reincarnated as precious's chimp.

You're pathetic.

**LnGrrrR** · 04-18-2009

Originally Posted by hope4dopes

My my your all in a huff aren't ya. not only did the right wing vote for the patriot act alot of democrats did too. Now let's see the patriot act for good or bad was voted on in congress in regards to an attack by Saudi nationals living in the U.S on visas, who drove two airplanes into the twin towers killing thousands and terrorizing New York and indeed the whole country, another plane driven into the Pentagon killing more, and an attempt to crash a third.
Obama's watch list was released a few days before a group of American citizens who happened to be political opponents of the Federal goverment,and the current adminsitration, gathered together to exercize their CONS UTIONAL rights to peacefull assembly and free speech(I've heard no reports of violence have you)
Yes your right, the parallels are uncanny.How thick of me to have missed them.

True, dumbass Democrats voted for it too. They doesn't change my point. Were you complaining about the Patriot Act when it was signed?

Are you or are you not ok with the Patriot Act, FISA, and "Free Speech Zones"? You're the one who calls yourself a libertarian.

While we're at it, Mr. Libertarian, are you for increased immigration? How about gay marriage or civil unions?

**George Gervin's Afro** · 06-13-2009

I'm glad the DHS is looking out for right wing nut jobs.

**ChumpDumper** · 06-13-2009

There are none!

And when there are, they are actually left wing!

I have a graph that proves it!

**DarrinS** · 06-13-2009

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

There are none!

And when there are, they are actually left wing!

I have a graph that proves it!

We are breeding them out of a camp in Alabama.

**George Gervin's Afro** · 08-01-2009

Browsing old threads and came across this one. Nice call conservatives.

**George Gervin's Afro** · 03-30-2010

Nice job Darrins..

**ChumpDumper** · 03-30-2010

Looks like the Bush administration was right on this one.

**ChumpDumper** · 03-30-2010

Originally Posted by DarrinS

we've got to protect ourselves from radical right-wingers.

**Winehole23** · 03-30-2010

Originally Posted by Marcus Bryant

Then the DHS bureaucrat who authored the advisory might think about sticking to those actual groups with a history of violence, right or left, and leave the rest of the citizenry who merely are exercising their 1st amendment rights (some in favor of another part of the Bill of Rights) out of it.

agrees very strongly, but specific examples would've been fodder for hostile inferences in just the same way IMO.

Persecution of extreme views for the actions they might (subjunctive mood) inspire, sorts ill with freedom ...

**Winehole23** · 03-30-2010

....but does befit a craven and timorous public that demands the state protect it from evildoers, then whines about statism.

**DarrinS** · 03-30-2010

Originally Posted by Winehole23

....but does befit a craven and timorous public that demands the state protect it from evildoers, then whines about statism.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Cons ution for the United States of America.

**Winehole23** · 03-30-2010

Presumably casting official su ion on "extreme views", absent any evidence of actual wrongdoing, answers to your notion of national defense.

It doesn't agree with mine.

**DarrinS** · 03-30-2010

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Presumably casting official su ion on "extreme views", absent any evidence of actual wrongdoing, answers to your notion of national defense.

It doesn't agree with mine.

I was just addressing your blanket statement. Not the incredibly old OP.

**Winehole23** · 03-30-2010

National defense isn't sufficient cause pick on kooky Americans merely for their beliefs.

**DarrinS** · 03-30-2010

Originally Posted by Winehole23

National defense isn't sufficient cause pick on kooky Americans merely for their beliefs.

I agree.

**Winehole23** · 03-30-2010

Then why did you mention it?

**LnGrrrR** · 03-31-2010

Those who would give up essential liberties for temporary security deserve neither.

**Winehole23** · 06-25-2015

http://securitydata.newamerica.net/e...y-attacks.html

**pgardn** · 06-25-2015

Originally Posted by Winehole23

http://securitydata.newamerica.net/e...y-attacks.html

NPR had something very similar to this yesterday but used the word terrorism to describe the attacks. And the study had a fairly rigid definition of what terrorism is. Essentially the jihadists attacks are right wing I would think. They come from a conservative belief system it seems.

This is where I get confused with terms used in politics.