Reply With Quote
Then draft JaJuan Johnson and Spurs` frontcourt would be very big. Four 7 footers + Bonner. I like it.
This deal is one of a few that I like in this thread. Even if he had to get Ryan Gomes back, It would not be a bad deal.
Then draft JaJuan Johnson and Spurs` frontcourt would be very big. Four 7 footers + Bonner. I like it.
I love jajuan johnson he's my first choice of college prospects to be taken. Lucas Nogueria is my first choice though, he would be a lottery pick taken a year early. It would be nice if jajuan could fall in the second round and spurs would buy a pick to get him and get lucas in the 1st round. If spurs are looking for a cheap decent backup as horrible as it sounds kwame brown would be a bad choice, he's not that bad for a backup, and wasn't that bad in LA.
Small forwards of my choice would be tashayn price then shane battier, and get earl clark for the minimum jusr in case butler doesn't work out.
Theres 2 trades that are avalable for us to make our team better:
Pacers Granger, Hibbert & Hansbrough for TP & Blair
Suns Nash, Gortat & RJ, McDyess, Bonner
These 2 trades would make the team alot better, more D, rebounds, lenght, assist, youth, experience, a play maker, and somebody that can teach Hill how to play the PG position the way it should be play.
Of course these trades would make us better. we pretty much rape Indy and the Suns.
We have to come up with realistic trades. With unrealistic trades is really easy to improve any team
This trades at not unrealistic at all. If you look at them all teams will benefit. The trade w/ the Pacers, will would have to send some Draft picks, so they can think about it, is not like they not getting anything in return, they getting somebody to run their offense, and getting a new face to their franchise. The suns already have Brooks and Lopez, this will give them a SF thats younger than their free agent Hill and that can play the up tempo that RJ is used to playing, they will get Bonner to open the floor for them and they will get MC's contract that will open cap space.
So, once again, this trades have logic and common sense.
OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING BETTER?????????????????????????????????
How is it realistic ? It is totally one-sided.
Indy trade : We get their starting SF (and franchise player), their starting Center (7"2 foot young Center with tons of potential in his rookie contract) and a PF prospect for Tony Parker and Dejuan Blair? Darren Colison becomes a backup just to fulfil the Spurs needs? They play without a starting Center and start next season with an unproven SF ?
The Suns trade is even worse
Nash and Gortat (the best Suns players) for a terrible contract (you realize they already have Childress as a SF with a bad contract as well), Dice (will retire) and Matt ing Bonner.
You are clueless.
Clueless??
Alright,
Indy Trade: Yes, we get their starting SF(and franchise player) in return we give them our stating PG(and franchise player, NBA Champ, and NBA Finals MVP) so that way they have somebody to run their offense, with championship expierence, we get a SF that has never taken his(franchise) team to the Playoff, their starting C is very negotiable, and they would get 1st round picks for that guy, their PF prospect cancel it selfsout with Blair(whos a better rebounder and better backup), and we will play without our starting PG and unproven PG in Hill.
Suns trade even better
Nash and Gortat (the best trade assets) first, if their starting Hill doesnt resign, which I think he wont(because he will try to get in a championship caliber team), they will have the need for a starting SF that can keep the up tempo, and Childress is not a SF he is a SG, and doesnt have that bad of a contract. They got Brooks for a reason, because his taking over Nash(so they no longer see Nash as a need, but as an assest), they also got Lopez, which is very capable of starting in the NBA, so once again Gortat not a need, but an assest, then they get the cap room from MC's contract, and then they would get Bonner a pretty good shooter that will open the floor for them offensessibly.
Point made, Mr. Clueless
NOW, DO YOU HAPPEN TO HAVE A BETTER TRADE????????????????????????????????
Dude, you really think that Pacers would trade Granger and Hibbert for TP ?
And Suns would trade their starting PG and C , only to get 4th SF with bad contract ?
It's gonna be a real long off season.
Once again if you read my explanation, then the anwer to your question is yes, I believe it can be done.
You high?
You said it brother...
If I may offer a little light...
TP and RJ are in the beginnings of their contracts - what ever team takes them in a trade must really like both of them to be the mainstays of their franchise. TP would be attractive to the likes of New York, Miami, Atlanta and perhaps New Orleans (if they feel strongly about CPIII leaving).
There are probably very few (read that as almost no) teams interested in taking on RJ's contract; probably the only way he's traded is if the Spurs insist on making him part of a package that is just too attractive for other teams to resist. Maybe Spurs mgt can convince the Wizards, Cavs, Utah or somebody to take him for a draft pic.
If not, Splitter, Blair, Neal and Hill make for good trade bait as they're relatively inexpensive, can play a fairly significant role in just about any system and are in the latter parts of their contracts (except for Splitter).
There ARE some teams that want to part ways w/ their more well known players (Golden State is looking to rid themselves on Monte Ellis, Philly of Iguodala and the Bucks of Brandon Jennings). Unless the Spurs luck up on a situation like these that makes sense to them, they're probably better off just waiting until TD retires and that frees up another $21 million for use in free agency.
So, I'd have to say that I agree - I doubt Indiana is interested in trading Granger. The Suns seem to be expecting Nash to leave as they traded for Aaron Brooks mid season.
You are really clueless. Grant Hill already said that he will resign with the Suns or retire if they don't want him. Chilldress has a horrible contract and the Suns don't need another overpaid wing. Lopez isn't capable of starting in the NBA. That's why the Suns traded their second best player (J-Rich) for Gortat. If the Suns trade Nash that means rebuild and they will ask for young talent and draft picks not RJ, McDyess and Bonner.
oh yes, they are.
currently top of the list of most unrealistic off season trade proposals.
won't stay there for the whole summer.
pretty sure you will soon compete for the top spot again with a new proposal.
Spurs and Sixers
Parker and Bonner for Elton Brand and Jrue Holiday?
Don't really want to get rid of tony but id love to get rid of bonner so this is just for discussion. Sixers get an all star PG to form with Iguodala to be probably the best back court in the nba.
Jrue Holiday 14pts 4 rebounds 7 assists 1.5 steals 37% 3PT
Elton Brand 15pts 8 rebounds 1 block 1 steal big body
Get rid of RJ for somebody, anyone at all and we'd be pretty solid
Duncan
Brand
F/A SF
Manu
Holiday
Hmm probably not a championship lineup anyway. Would have to see what we could do at SF. Oh well this is the thinktank isn't it
The 76rs and Doug Collins especially are really high on Holliday I doubt they'd trade him.Spurs and Sixers
Parker and Bonner for Elton Brand and Jrue Holiday?
Don't really want to get rid of tony but id love to get rid of bonner so this is just for discussion. Sixers get an all star PG to form with Iguodala to be probably the best back court in the nba.
Jrue Holiday 14pts 4 rebounds 7 assists 1.5 steals 37% 3PT
Elton Brand 15pts 8 rebounds 1 block 1 steal big body
Get rid of RJ for somebody, anyone at all and we'd be pretty solid
Duncan
Brand
F/A SF
Manu
Holiday
Hmm probably not a championship lineup anyway. Would have to see what we could do at SF. Oh well this is the thinktank isn't it
If the Clippers are rumoured to be willing to take in Andre Iguodala by swapping him for Chris Kaman, would they not be interested in taking Richard Jefferson instead? Arguably a far worse player than Iguodala, Jefferson's advantage is a relatively better contract than the former. Kaman is no special center, but he will be an adequate backup and a replacement for McDyess, besides commanding an expiring contract. Besides, the Spurs will finally let go of Richard Jefferson and his under-performance.
latest update about that rumour has the sixers demanding more than kaman for Iguodala....
There's really no argument.
Clips' fan perspective - http://www.clipsnation.com/2011/6/8/...is-kaman-trade ..
Richard Jefferson seems to be one among the many choices.
The writer just listed every small forward who's been an all-star. There was no consideration given to Jefferson other than that, he was just listed among other has-beens (Peja) and franchise-killing contracts (Rashard Lewis).
If I were the Clippers GM, I would not trade Kaman for RJ. Not even if the Spurs threw in their 1st round pick...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
