Rasho is a better defender than Wilcox, Rasho has a solid midrange game that I'm yet to see from Wilcox, Rasho knows the system and Wilcox is unlikely to ever be able to learn it, Rasho actually busts a gut and Wilcox doesn't.
So how about you explain to me why Wilcox is such a wonderful fit? He's an athlete, nothing more, and the Spurs' system demands more than just athleticism.
Talented scorer, pretty damn good rebounder, and he's young.
He's never played with a good team, so I would be curious to see what he could do being in a stable system with great players around him.
Not the end of the world. Get Dice.
i'm fine with either sheed or mcdyess. i would have preferred sheed because he would make matt bonner obsolete and is taller to defend gasol. i suspected that sheed may have little less in the tank and that a 2-3 year contract would be unwise. maybe the spurs thought so too. but now, really, it's mcdyess or bust.
. So Finley's sorry ing ass ensured the Spurs weren't going to spend the MLE?
Wilcox > Thomas > Bonner > Oberto
It ain't no fascination is the hope of an upgrade of someone that may end up beasting if being put in the right situation...
Hear hear!
FOs thinking solely on potential is how players like Kwame Brown have stayed in the league so long.
Just saying.
I know I know, I just hate Rasho. Sadly, your probably right..............
But Wilcox is still young, and I still believe he could flourish in the right situation.
You are just looking for reasons to rip Finley. How can you pull that from Timvp's statement?
Let it play out.
Wilcox's work ethic is MIA.
I'm sure anyone who has watched him over the last few years would back that up.
He occasionally produces a highlight reel play, and he had 3 nice seasons for the Sonics in the middle of the decade , but he was in an ideal situation for his talents last year (the Knicks) and bombed. Guy does not work.
In a perfect world the Celtics would be so enamored with Rasheed that they'd send us Perkins for Mason and matching salary.
As Ruff said, Wilcox's problem isn't talent..he's probably one of the top 5 laziest players in the NBA, that's been his rap his entire career..he's a wasted talent..
Then you are probably right. Especially with the way Pop tosses people in the doghouse for not working hard enough. Then we will be on here complaining why Pop isn't giving Wilcox any PT. lol I had no idea how he has been producing other than looking at his numbers.
dude, I'll back that up. The guy has been lazy as , but I think Pop could motivate him. He shouldn't be a main option, which many teams have made the mistake of doing. But as a role player I just think he could flourish. And calling the Knicks an ideal situation for any player is kind of silly.
But I've wanted him on the Spurs for like 3 years, so Im kind of biased.
I've been posting that all along!
The Spurs need a defensive-minded big instead of Sheed. That's why I was high on Gortat instead of him.
I was lukewarm about the Spurs signing him. If they did....I could live with it.
Now that he's gone to Boston.....if may work out for him.
I still felt (from everything I've read) that the Spurs were not really interested. RC said on 760 the Ticket after the draft with getting Blair they could be a lot more selective in getting a big.
Then Sheed's agent commented that San Antonio needed to show a little more interest in acquiring his client.
Those two things kind of gave me the impression they were not that interested.
Anyway, let's see what FO comes up with. As fans...we want the FO get a big name so we can brag to Laker fan or Mav fan or Rocket fan about who we could attract to SA.
However, that has been clear opposite of how the FO has done business the last 10 years.
So let see what happens in the next day or so....and I still think team got better, younger, and more athletic in the offseason so far!
![]()
God I'd pay a ticket to see your face if we sign him and end up being HUGE on a ship' run... Crow is better served cold...
So could Stromile Swift, and that didn't translate into anything either.
I'm not arguing that Wilcox couldn't contribute - just saying that 'what could be' scenarios have rarely worked in favor of any FO taking that chance.
See, the thing is, he's not that young any more. Next season will be his 10th!!! That's why I know he's not going to suddenly become a different player. By the 10th season in the NBA, you know what you are getting from a guy.
Don't get me wrong, I hope we do better than Rasho, but I also know that Wilcox isn't the guy.
Agreed on that!![]()
Now Celtics is the best team in the NBA by far...
Finley had nothing to with the Spurs' MLE. He had a player option to come back to the Spurs. He was coming back...especially it was his decision not the Spurs.
You're just taking a cheap shot at him!!![]()
Is it a certainty we get McDyess?
Again, I'm not surprised Rasheed went to Boston. Perhaps he figures he has a better shot at winning another ring with the Celtics in the "Leastern" conference vs. the WC.![]()
And Boston really wooed him vs the Spurs who didn't seem to show much interest though many says he's a better fit w/the Spurs than the Celts.
Not quite....
even on paper they're not the best team. The Lakers has the best team on paper.
But you don't win anything on paper.........let's see what happens in the next day or so.
Knicks before D'Antoni would have been silly, but Knicks since D'Antoni are on a different path. What I meant was that if he was going to thrive in any system it would have been D'Antoni's, given his athleticism and open-court gifts, but he did nothing.
Anyway, given the Spurs' proclivity for character guys, it's highly unlikely that Wilcox is on their board.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)