Reply With Quote
Well that makes sense; Willis couldn't guard anyone anymore, either.
You think you're betteren me?!
Oh wait, you have the rainbow avitar.
Nevermind.
Well that makes sense; Willis couldn't guard anyone anymore, either.
Nah, I can think for myself. Not bringing Bruce back this year is a huge mistake.
He contributed where he needed to contribute. Bruce would do the same. I don't hear someone say Bruce can't gaurd anyone anymore and I immediatly believe it, just cuz people repeat what someone said over and over again. I'm not one of those people. Bruce is still the best peremiter defender in the NBA, by far.
I truly believe #12 will be back. Sorry for using this word but "Smokescreen or Cia pop" really makes sense in this case given the nature of the situation.
I hope so.
Well, it's closure. Finley stays, Bruce leaves.
Barring some trade before the deadline, and that's doubtful as *CIA Poop* was talking about resting Mrs. PopaFin for back to backs.
Way to check our nutts out Popped.
For you haters who will twist that this post was about our le chances hinging on Bruce, it wasn't. It was about if one of two are kept, Finley or Bruce, who would it be?
Popped has shown where his loyalty lies. 5 freakin years of fulltime Finleyovich, with one le to show for it.
Lets hope the 2009-10 roster can overcome Poops incompetence.
Thanks for the years of service, Bruce!
Fabbs is working hard on challenging ducks for the le of site re .
you still don't understand that it was never a one or the other situation......Well, it's closure. Finley stays, Bruce leaves.
Barring some trade before the deadline, and that's doubtful as *CIA Poop* was talking about resting Mrs. PopaFin for back to backs.
Way to check our nutts out Popped.
For you haters who will twist that this post was about our le chances hinging on Bruce, it wasn't. It was about if one of two are kept, Finley or Bruce, who would it be?
Popped has shown where his loyalty lies. 5 freakin years of fulltime Finleyovich, with one le to show for it.
Lets hope the 2009-10 roster can overcome Poops incompetence.
Thanks for the years of service, Bruce!
One of these days it will register with you that Bruce was released by the Bucks, free to sign with any team and negotiate the salary at that.
Meanwhile the 127 million dollar stealer Finley could be moved to make room for Bruce. Or if Finley had an ounce of loyalty he would thank the Spurs (including Bruce) for getting him a le and retire. Like after 2007. Certainly now.
Go away!
Thanks again Bruce.
You're the king of the false premise.
They would never have had to move Finley.
In reality, the Spurs chose Malik Hairston and Marcus Williams over Bruce.
[cue Fabbs' saying something like Popsucker or other five-year old attempt at an insult when faced with a simple fact.]
Well said.
Unfortunately, Fabbs is not deterred by facts.
Some people forget that there's a business side to it. The teams have to do what they feel is in the best interest of the team, and players do what they feel is in the best interest of them and their family. The Spurs felt that they needed to get YOUNGER, and they did. The Cowboys faced the same situations with Troy Aikman and Emmit Smith, both of them better players than Bruce Bowen, yet they were still released from the Cowboys. Sometimes it's better to move on than trying to keep things afloat with the same pieces.
Troy Aikman retired dumbass.
Nice mature response.
Fail. He was released by Jerry first, then he retired.
http://football.about.com/library/weekly/aa041001.htmTroy Aikman announced his retirement from the NFL Monday afternoon, after 12 years and three Super Bowl championships as the starting quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys. Aikman, who was released by the Cowboys about a month ago, decided to call it quits when little interest was shown for his services by other NFL teams.
Whott in the athletic big man is not far behind.
As for Finley vs Bowen, Finley chose to stay. Pop had no say in it. Plus, Bruce was traded before Finley's decision. And Finley can still hit an outside shot (his skill) while Bruce's defense slipped.
Bruce could still be effective, but he wasn't Bruce anymore, you know?
Well, that's one theory. But doesn't it make so much more sense to believe that the guy who has led this team to 4 les suddenly decided to put a man-crush for Michael Finley and a vendetta against Bruce Bowen ahead of doing what's best for the team?
Pop had no say in it?Cmon man, i expect that from the HumpMel etc type twisters but not you. Pop has had everything to say re Finley since 2006. In 2007 Popped took on that new position that gave him vitually all powers re player say so.
Compare Bruces shot vs Fins shot last playoffs.
Plus for every shot Fins hits he gets absolutely roasted twice (3Xs?) by the other playoff teams 3/4s, ie Josh Howard.
I guess it does!
(Are you being sarcastic?)
A small quan y of quality posts is worth more then a whole dance floor filled with failed redundant posters and their posts.
Because there's nothing redundant about you wanting to bump this thread over and over so that you can drop Popafinley references..........
A small quan y of quality posts is worth more then a whole dance floor filled with failed redundant posters and their posts.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions
