Reply With Quote
lol that's what you'd think. I laugh at how you walked right into it.
z0sa, you know what he meant. Don't be purposely obtuse. It's as bad as citing somebody for bad spelling. C'mon, act like somebody.
lol that's what you'd think. I laugh at how you walked right into it.
walked right into the joke you're the only person laughing at......shame on me.
wrong. He said manu wouldn't make the hof. Everyone immediately started calling him out for being a re . He backtracked and said he wouldn't make it into the "nba" hall of fame. Well, there is no "nba" hall of fame and never has been. So obviously, some people just underrates manu or are ignorant to his accomplishments.
Well, since Dirk's Mavs lost to the Hornets, who lost to the Spurs, who lost to the Lakers, who lost to Garnett's Celtics, Garnett > Dirk.
EDIT: Oh, and KG didn't choke in the Finals.
I honestly thought there was an NBA HoF.
Of course Manu is gonna make the basketball HoF. He's won all that overseas and has won 3 championships in the NBA.
No he's ok, I was asking for the NBA hall of fame 'cause somebody in here said that there was the NBA hall of fame and the Basketball hall of fame. I already knew that the basketball hall of fame exists I wanted to know if the NBA hall of fame also exists but it turns out it doesn't
If that is true, I stand corrected.
how would you know that? someone doesn't have to post a smilie that's laughing, or LOL, to laugh at post.
1st of all if we're doing best right now how the can you say its not dirk?
Garnett used to be great on offense but not so much anymore.
2nd of all no more trolls voting!
It's not like he played extremely well offensively, the difference is he didn't need to. He had Paul Pierce.
I stand corrected.
ing re ed.
it wasn't Garnett's team alone. Who won Finals MVP again?
Garnett was the third option on the team. Dirk was the go-to guy on the Mavericks the entire finals
Idk if Dirk on the Celts wins a championship, but it def. gets to the finals. Boston in neutralized the pick and roll last year cause of KG where they clogged up the strong side of the court, they wouldn't have been able to do that with Dirk.
But will allow 106+
Yeah that's true, but you need to be a top 5 defensive team to win it all. They still could have very well been a top 5 defensive team with Dirk, back in 2006 and 2007 he was a decent defender.
For comparison (referencing 08 seasons, all stats from NBA.com)
Dirk = 25.9 points per game divided by 20 shots = 1.295 pts per shot
KG = 15.8 PPG divided by 13 shots per game = 1.215 pts per shot
So yes, Dirk is more efficient at getting pts per shot. For comparison:
D-Wade = 30.2 PPG at roughly 22 shots per game = 1.372 pts per shot
Kobe = 26.8 PPG at 20.87 shots per game = 1.284 pts per shot
Parker = 22 PPG at 17.54 shots per game = 1.254 pts per shot
Ginobili = 15.5 PPG at 11.15 shots per game = 1.39 pts per shot
Allen = 18.2 PPG at 13.164 shots per game = 1.334 pts per shot
Chris Paul = 22.8 PPG at 16.089 shots per game = 1.417 pts per shot
James = 28.4 PPG at 19.91 shots per game = 1.426 pts per shot
dirk on that celtics team does not win the le. if dirk allen and pierce were on the floor together, there isnt enough shots. the reason the celtics won the ring in 08 was because of their toughness and defense. both traits weren't there before kg got there. he made perkins and powe play with a sense on urgency on defense.
kg>>> dirk
It's like the Pro Football HoF, that includes the Canadian leagues and a few others.
The Basketball Hall of Fame also includes ABA and other things.
Right now ill take dirk
dirk with boston would be like the suns when they had nash marion and amare. great team but no ring
It is a tragedy that KG isn't winning. Dirk spends his time with hood rats, while KG taught his team defense and toughness. All Dirk knows how to do is quit midway through a series.
I think I'm going to have create a few alts to help KG out.
Bump will beat you to the ground.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
