Williams better than Parker???
maybe 2 years ago they were dead even. Now, parker left him in the dust
To be honest, I am not too keen on either one, for building or as a piece. Neither one of their defenses are particularly good. However TP has proven he can play second fiddle and not dominate an offense... dominating an offense is bad when you are a PG...
Do you make an intentional effort to say the dumbest possible? How do you go from saying Parker is the 3rd best player on the Spurs to saying he's the 2nd best PG in the NBA?Williams better than Parker???
maybe 2 years ago they were dead even. Now, parker left him in the dust
Im embarrased for anyone who said Parker.
Are you obliged to call me moron ?
Nostradamus who seems to be re ed stated that Parker had 0 Defense whatsoever. For me the lowest level of D in the league for a PG is Nash so by this logic something even the lowest is still > 0.
BTW I was not so wrong because Nostradamus who seems to be re ed consider that taking charges is a demonstration of Nash>TP on D.
Oh and Parker is decent on D when he is focus, most of the time in PO.
So it's ok because 99% of the posters are saying that Paul is the better player.
Don't start, da. I have those pics somewhere on this hard drive and I afraid to lodge 'em.
tee, hee.
I agree with everything Spurstrodamus said.
Yes, because you are a moron.
Nash wasn't a part of the discussion until you brought him up, due to your unexplainable insecurity about Tony Parker, which caused you to bring up a player that wasn't even part of the discussion, for the sole purpose of trashing him to exalt Parker.
Lame
Yes, because you are a moron.
Nash wasn't a part of the discussion until you brought him up, due to your unexplainable insecurity about Tony Parker, which caused you to bring up a player that wasn't even part of the discussion, for the sole purpose of trashing him to exalt Parker.
Lame
I'm ok with it because it led to someone posting one of the dumbest comments in ST history.
and you are an ass.Yes, because you are a moron.
Nash wasn't a part of the discussion until you brought him up, due to your unexplainable insecurity about Tony Parker, which caused you to bring up a player that wasn't even part of the discussion, for the sole purpose of trashing him to exalt Parker.
Lame
What unexplainable insecurity about Tony Parker ? read the posts you will see that I stated 10000 times that CP3 is the better player and I also think that DW is slightly better than him. I'm not trashing Nash, I'm a big fan of Nash it was just to illustrate a stupid Nostradamus statement. Saying that, if you have to pick the weakest on D among PGs don't tell me Nash won't come into your mind and don't tell me either that you think like Nostradamus that TP has no D at all whatsoever.
Don't get me wrong I do not think TP is good at D, I just think he is decent when he is focus mainly during PO.
Great. It still has nothing to do with the fact that Nash wasn't a part of the discussion until you brought him in, to focus on his inability to play defense in order to make Parker look like a less ty defender.
And yes, Tony Parker is a poor defender.
CP3 is a badass player. He's also a .
TP is a badass player. He's not a .
Based solely on talent, I'd have to go with the flopper. In spite of that, TP is my all-around favorite player. Not being a has something to do with that.
What pics?
I get your point stretch. You are not going to sue me for bringing Nash into this discussion, right ?
I didn't bring Nash to make parker look like a less ty defender but just to highlight it is stupid to write parker has no D whatsoever.
Now I wouldn't say he is a poor defender, when he wants and when it matters he can be decent.
Damn.
I thought it was one of those re ed threads from DAF86
lol wow, i'm sorry but CP3 is much better than TP as of right now. There's not much to argue about right now. I think TP is 3rd behind DW.
Tony Parker all day, every day.
I think on any given night they are both capable of putting up big games. Chris Paul I think is a better passer. CP flops way too much whenever he's bumped. Unlike TP, who mans it up and takes it to hole and gets knocked down but hops back up. That says alot about thier characters. Also if you think about it, Parker's already done so much. Overall I think TP would rather have his career moreso than CP's -who's excelled individually, but not with his team. And TP takes alot of crap because he plays with TD, and thats why he's won on the big stage. So I guess with that mentality, CP needs someone like a TD because he sure as hasn't won a championship last time I checked.
son that is the worst homer post I have seen yet ... do you seriously believe that nonsense? lol ... I mean, REALLY?
Wow, un ingbelievable, Spurs fans criticizing a player for flopping. What's even funnier is someone saying Parker never flops. I remember Eva actually saying something along the lines of, "I'm tired of him falling down every time someone touches him. I can never tell if he's trying to get a call, or if he's actually hurt."
She deserved an OTK spanking for that.
I'll do the administering of course.
Paul.
He's the best PG in the league and is the best the league has seen for many many years, probably since J-Kidd was in his prime.
I hate how posters on here refer to a select few as Spursfans. It's not all of us that say stupid things, and I hate getting lumped into that. Funny how Spursfans criticize for flopping. Spursfans are all picking TP. It's not all of us.
/rant
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
