Reply With Quote
Come spring the trout season should be great then.
Come spring the trout season should be great then.
So the next time we have 90+ in January, we should post that it's proof of global warming?
I don't believe in the extreme man-caused climate change theories either, but these kind of things are rather pathetic to keep bringing up. Outliers mean nothing. Single occurances mean nothing.
At least show an elongated pattern.
meet darrins
This is going to be an unusually cold winter.
it might rain.
No, the fact is that if we were in a "Global Warming," we should no longer see record cold patterns. At least not as many as we do!
I didn't see you saying when San Antonio had the hottest month in its history this July.
I guess it's another Fall and Winter of these threads. Fun.
And that was going on while the northern part of the country was having one of it's coldest summers ever.
I've lived here most of my life. It's always hot as here in the summer.
Not as hot as it was this July, you ignorant .
I hope you die.
Hey, let's use DarrinS's re ed logic in some other contexts.
I'll start of with:
Matt Bonner scored 25 on 11-14 shooting against Golden State. Therefore, he's an all-star caliber forward.
Funny how as a city grows bigger and bigger, more concrete, more asphalt, less trees and other vegetation...
That it gets hotter!
Who would have guessed...
last year was pretty friggin cold too. So I guess that means 2 outliers in a row??
Are you seriously trying to defend this guy? He doesn't even know what battle he's trying to fight. Global warming is obvious by looking at glacier recession over the last 150 years from the Sierras to the Rockies to Greenland, etc. To say man isn't responsible and that it's part of a natural cycle is one thing, but to throw crap like this out and act like there's no such thing is beyond stupidity. He completely sidesteps the major issue to disagree with something obvious that isn't in the least bit controversial, backing it with anecdotal evidence about two early snowfalls.
Who's saying there's no such thing?
Besides, Glaciers have been receding for the last 11,000 years. Why is there something so special about the last 150? Is it because we have had cameras about that long?
Don't play stupid. What else would DarrinS be implying?
Temperatures were lower, at least in North America, from about 1250 to 1850.Besides, Glaciers have been receding for the last 11,000 years. Why is there something so special about the last 150? Is it because we have had cameras about that long?
That the Global Warming we experienced is back to a Global Cooling trend.
Just a part of nature's cyclical nature!
So you're one of those kind of deniers.
Every candle that burns completely produces 15 grams of carbon dioxide. If an estimated one million Israeli households light for eight days, they said, it would do significant damage to the atmosphere.
We will be experiencing Global Warming as a long term trend for the next 26,000 years due to the Earths eccentricity getting smaller until then. However, that effect is very small in the short span, but should be rather pronounced in another 10,000 years. Meanwhile, there will still be shorter solar cycles of 11 and 19 years amplifying and canceling each other each other about every 120 years. The Bond events of approximately 1500 years. El Niño, La Niña, and so many other natural patterns.
Thing is, climate is always changing. Anthropogenic Warming is a hoax in that we cannot possibly compete with nature. CO2, at best, accounts for 1/3rd of the warming we experienced since 1700. It is more likely under 1/5th. The temperature island of urban sprawl are insignificant to the size of the planet.
LOL...
If the candle burns four hours, then that's 161 tons if I did my math right. Our CO2 output is something like 28 giga-tons annually. (28,000,000,000)
Who said that?
You're going to have to show your work for full credit.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
