Okay...so now someone explain this to me. Why would an NBA head coach want to change a good thing? I mean, a team is down 20 pts, then get to within 1 pt. Then he benches the "bench", and brings out the "cold shooting" starters (Duncan is the exception), and then collapse with Parker attempting to be the hero when he turned out to be the absolute zero! Then bring in Hill when it's FAR too late to recognize the error he made on taking him out. I just don't get it. Why did he break something that did NOT need fixing?
I just don't understand his train of thought here.

Reply With Quote



