You think that is the only cost?![]()
You can tell me. You know all about it.You should google the law.
No, it's a step towards real reform. If all of Arizona does their part to make this law work, it's a big step towards reform. How is it a waste of time and money? The police are paid already.
You should google the law.
You think that is the only cost?![]()
You can tell me. You know all about it.You should google the law.
If you disagree with mogrovejo's abstract restatements of the case -- any case -- the only possible explanations are perversity and mental incapacity.
It's as if he mistakes his own economistic reductions of reality for reality itself, with the result that validity attaches only to agreement, and the putative topic (the longer he remains in the thread) tends to collapse into a dispute about the academic veracity (his professional bailiwick) of the various economic abstractions mogrovejo proposes himself. Should one ever stray beyond the academic issues identified by mogrovejo, one becomes "unserious," "unreliable" -- and perhaps, crazy.
Last edited by Winehole23; 05-06-2010 at 03:50 PM.
Hence the risible, yet touchingly absurd spectacle of mogrovejo citing himself in defense of himself, and deriving apparent comfort therefrom.
Last edited by Winehole23; 05-06-2010 at 03:57 PM.
So tell us all, jack.
We're waiting.
Why would you want that?
Taking away employment opportunities from immigrants implies less economic well-being and opportunities for everybody.
I mean, Cuba doesn't have a problem with immigration precisely because there aren't employment opportunities for immigrants. That's not good for Cuba though.
Why would I want to restrict the employment opportunities for illegal immigrants?
To "severely reduce the number of immigrants," of course.
Why does it imply that? Looks like you overthought this one, genius.Taking away employment opportunities from immigrants implies less economic well-being and opportunities for everybody.
I told you what to do, you won't do it. Dumper of all Chumps, it is generally you who is waiting, not anyone else.
Already looked it up. It gave no examples.
So tell me, jack.
I'm waiting.
LOL @ examples. You're a smart guy. You will figure it out without my help.
No, it's pretty unclear to me. Give me some examples, jack.
Why do you want to reduce the number of immigrants? You don't like immigrants?
I don't think so. I believe you'll be very dissapointed if you believe you can legislate that employment opportunities that may entice immigrants to enter the country illegally are prohibited. Reminds me of the candlestick makers' pe ion to prohibit the sun.
Reducing the number of immigrants through prohibitionist can be achieved to some degree, but at the cost of economic prosperity.
Illegal immigrants. For all your pontificating, you're pretty stupid.
You can't think of anything on your own, can you?I don't think so. I believe you'll be very dissapointed if you believe you can legislate that employment opportunities that may entice immigrants to enter the country illegally are prohibited. Reminds me of the candlestick makers' pe ion to prohibit the sun.
Reducing the number of immigrants through prohibitionist can be achieved to some degree, but at the cost of economic prosperity.
I'll wait until you read some more peer reviewed papers.
Why can't you?
Why not simply make all immigration legal then? That seems to be the easiest way to solve the problem of illegal immigration if the problem is indeed the "illegal".
Strong counter-arguments.
Checking someones ID during a police stop to see if someone is legal or not seems pretty freaken easy to me. Plus it doesn't cost much or waste anyones elses time.
Not all immigration should be illegal.
They match your initial arguments.Strong counter-arguments.
I'll wait until someone else tells you what to think.
Which immigration should be illegal? And why?
Immigration that is not legal.By definition.And why?
You don't understand the simplest terms.
Is there currently immigration that is not legal?
Yes or no.
lol at this sons![]()
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)