Reply With Quote
So then the Mosque is ok.
Thanks.
Like me board liberals, Like me!!
So then the Mosque is ok.
Thanks.
You honestly don't know why anyone would be offended by a 100 million dollar mega mosque being built at that location?
Let them build it then fly an Iranian airliner into it.
So what's your point, and how does it has anything to do with building a religious temple?
Would you object if it was a 2 million dollar mini mosque?
Or size has nothing to do with it?
Just pointing out hypocrisy of the left.
So it has nothing to do with it.
Such as.....
And he has the right, but do you think the imam just bought it just because? Or do you think that there may be an underlying statement he wants to make to other muslims around the world.
I mean, I'm not going to force him out, but it's my right to call this whole thing as abrasive.
I don't think that site is an ideal place for a mosque.
Plenty of mosques and muslims in the US. If there was a point to be made about their religion, they already have.
That doesn't mean all muslims are radicals or all mosques are terrorist breeding grounds, as implied by Mr DarrinS
And that's a fairly reasonable response. Apparently, it is abrasive otherwise we wouldnt be having this discussion. He may very well be making a statement. I can think of either a really good one and a really evil one. But thinking it doesn't make it exist.
Don't congratulate him, you don't have to feel sorry about your self congratulatory fun in this thread before people came in here to spoil it.
Sooooo then you are saying rule of law works and is a good thing?
Personally, I think it would be cool if they put the Mosque up and a Christian church right next to it and had both perform many unity services.
Why is that?
On the contrary, Darrin posts in nearly every thread lead to fun.
because the own that land. Pretty simple actually.
I know why. Prejudice.
That's the answer. There's really no way around it, Darrin. You may not think of yourself as prejudiced but there is no other possible reason for trying to block a worship center for a religion practiced by over 1 billion people over the fact that 19 of that religion's followers, with the support of a foreign terrorist group, attacked an area nearby.
Connecting the actions of an extreme few to the religious practice of a billion others is the very definition of prejudice.
Those sneaky Episcopalians do that very thing.
One who dares to critique a putative "conservative" such as Darrin is automatically a leftist or attempting to curry favor. You're another worthless moron who's helped to destroy the American right.
Basically.
This is not a court of law, do you need actual statements or records to see that? Do you think he'd say those things in public to risk his property? Or can we go by the historical practice of Islam of always wanting to be abrasive towards their opponents. I mean these are the same guys who built mosques and veneration sites over jewish and christian ones. The same people who claimed jerusalem was a holy site only when the christians sought it even tho jerusalem had no importance to mohammed.
If this american right sees the return to fake balanced budgets due to borrowing money from lock boxes and interventions in the balklands, tech bubbles, and loose Fed reserve policy, as the pinnacle of American policy they too can go themselves.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions