why dont you put your unavailable off
linkThe 2011 Super Bowl has two classic teams -- the Green Bay Packers and the Pittsburgh Steelers -- meeting in one legendary setting. But tradition will be broken in this Bowl, and it may or may not upset you.
There won't be any cheerleaders. No cheerleaders! (But question: Aren't they more like dance squads, anyway? I don't see them doing any stunts.) The Packers and the Steelers are two of six teams in the NFL that do not have shiny, glittery, extremely fit women on their sidelines cheering them on.
"But, but, the pom poms!" you say. "The tradition! It's Dallas, for crying out loud, home of the most famous cheerleading squad in the world, the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders, and there's just going to be ... no one cheering?"
Hmm, I have a feeling we'll all be OK without the professionals, don't you?
Listen, I understand the appeal of cheerleaders and don't necessarily think the ... sport? ... is a bad one. For girls growing up who don't like contact sports but still want to be involved in school or community athletics, cheer and dance are great options. And they need someone to look up to.
But on the other hand, cheerleaders are objectified more than other female athletes and there's been plenty of controversy over uniforms and discrimination. Heck, there was even a murder when a Texas mom hired a hit man to kill the mother of her daughter's cheering compe ion.
Maybe NFL cheerleaders are becoming something of the past, maybe a little outdated. Maybe we won't miss the bare midriffs and heavy makeup. Maybe we've evolved past it.
why hooray?
this blog/article sounds like it was written by a jealous chick that got discriminated against in high school
I just copied and pasted the story.
yeah, I meant that mad mother against cheerleaders author
When I first read it, I thought the same thing.
lol gay football teams
And reasons to watch the Superbowl continue to disappear...
aren't they all soft-porn "dancers" now?
cheerleaders? how quaint.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 01-31-2011 at 05:13 PM.
Yes.Hmm, I have a feeling we'll all be OK without the professionals, don't you?
Yes it is. It's probably the sole most pathetic "sport"...because they are not playing against anyone (in traditional function of cheerleading). The "sport" is here because it is entirely devoted to satisfying entertainment during other sports.Listen, I understand the appeal of cheerleaders and don't necessarily think the ... sport? ... is a bad one.
OK, how ing old are you, author? This in bold is the dumbest cliche mentality. They do not need NFL cheerleaders to look up to.For girls growing up who don't like contact sports but still want to be involved in school or community athletics, cheer and dance are great options. And they need someone to look up to.
Yes.Hmm, I have a feeling we'll all be OK without the professionals, don't you?
Yes it is. It's probably the sole most pathetic "sport"...because they are not playing against anyone (in traditional function of cheerleading). The "sport" is here because it is entirely devoted to satisfying entertainment during other sports.Listen, I understand the appeal of cheerleaders and don't necessarily think the ... sport? ... is a bad one.
OK, how ing old are you, author? This in bold is the dumbest cliche mentality. They do not need NFL cheerleaders to look up to.For girls growing up who don't like contact sports but still want to be involved in school or community athletics, cheer and dance are great options. And they need someone to look up to.
having cheerleaders in Godforsaken green Bay is pointless, too cold to wear those outfits.
pitt needs cheerleaders to sacrifice to big ben though
cheerleaders are not any reason to watch 3 hours of a game. Have you never seen an attractive woman in your life? It's pretty easy, you can do it much more efficiently time-wise and at higher quality than watching an nfl game.
They make gloves and hats.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)