So basically you believe in this so passionately, you aren't going to do about it except announce to the board you don't know how to find an email address.
OK.
Which one(s)?
What did you ask?
What was the reply?
So basically you believe in this so passionately, you aren't going to do about it except announce to the board you don't know how to find an email address.
OK.
Great. However does one have to be a paid member of the media to get said credential?
Was simply asking if you already had the emails in one page.
Figured it was your insincere childishness as usual but gave you the op -and you took it. Hump style.
That doesn't even make any sense.
You aren't going to email anyone.
lol calling someone else insincere.
Troll off Humpy.
btw are you a Pop Suck Up media member in training?
Brian Collister, during the floods
Why did you have to wear a brand new raincoat including hat (dried and just out the package) in the studio at the news desk?
No response
Pretty sure that bloggers can get credentials.
If you'd rather have proxies do your dirty work for you, here are some places to direct your demands for better coverage:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected] (Follow: @noaveragejoejr)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
You've been called out. And now someone held your hand, did a big boy search for you and you have your addresses.
Do you need help with your email program now?
Really?
That was your email?
A few more, Fabbs, just in case you intend to carpet bomb the SA media:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Be sure to make stupid nicknames for them and all the players and coaches you talk about. It's very professional and will guarantee a response.
And still a few more:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Asking explanation for starter. Not just a yes or no question.
Asking why he trust someone with a history of playoff failing like Bonner over Splitter
Asking why he didn't developped him more during the regular season
etc...
Question we would actually like to know the answer. Even if there is no doubt that Pop would only make a joke out of it
It was after the loss in game 1 as indicated in the question : Will he play game 2And how stupid would it be to ask that question after a victory -- especially when the story of the game is Manu?
Tell em chump sent you
reporters get 1 or 2 questions at most. How obsessed would a reporter have to be to bring up Splitter maybe as obsessed as the OP?
And when Popovich refuses to answer, then what?
This.
Thanks. I couldn't remember the guy's name, but I remember that he got fired for being too honest about the spurs. Remember that media owns minority positions in the spurs.
Not true. I have seen plenty of time with no one having questions during a Pop interview.
Once Pop even said : you are that many and you have nothing to ask ? And he asked a question to the camera guy.
A question about Splitter developpement was possible..
At least they would have done their job as media.
What!!??!! A media complaint thread? Wow... there's a 1st for everything.
in a playoff game?? BS
Pop doesn't answer questions he doesn't want to answer. HE would either give a smart ass response, or just the silent methodical stare down of the reporter. Come on guys you have known Pop long enough.
Ask it again, and then report on the question on the sportscast about it not being answered, then have a poll about it or a discussion. That's publicity and doing something about it, holding him accountable. Instead of just one and done.
I guess when Bush started the illegal war noone should have asked questions just because he wouldn't answer them. Oh wait...
How exactly is that holding Popovich accountable?
Are you serious? Press conferences are for a reason, to ask questions and to have them answered. If he's not answering something people want to know, expose him and run a story on it, the same way everyone did when they were questioning Sploestras job early in the season and any other matter.
Accountability suggests that there might be adverse action if things don't change.
Do you really think the Spurs would fire Popovich if he refuses to answer questions about his rotation?
Frankly, it strikes me as being little different than the idle speculation in this forum, which obviously hasn't changed anything.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)