Is it a problem that's not on the radar and shouldn't be, or it is a problem that should be on the radar and is being ignored.
If you don't think the WNBA is a problem, why do you agree it should be scrapped?
So I guess you don't have a link.
As for the WNBA clause in the CBA, I never said there was one. I said there's a portion of NBA revenue league officials controlled.
Is it a problem that's not on the radar and shouldn't be, or it is a problem that should be on the radar and is being ignored.
If you don't think the WNBA is a problem, why do you agree it should be scrapped?
I never said I had one. I said this is the kind of thing the board does.
So you just didn't know what you were talking about.As for the WNBA clause in the CBA, I never said there was one. I said there's a portion of NBA revenue league officials controlled.
How big a problem do you think it is?
How much money do you think was spent to subsidize the WNBA last season?
My guess is it's been an 8 figure amount as long as the WNBA has been around.
Alright.
You see the part where I said add a clause? Ever think that means there currently isn't one, hence why I said "add" and not "alter"?
Why'd you originally try to post one then?
Why wouldn't there be one? Or some other clause saying the commissioner can do that kind of thing?
That makes no sense according to your theory.
What do you think the NBA spends every year to keep the WNBA alive? Also, why do you care so much about the WNBA?
How long they've been around anyways? Feels like forever for an experiment...
If there was one, why the would I have said add a clause?
Dunno. I was asking you.Who said I did?Also, why do you care so much about the WNBA?
And I gave an answer. Curious what you think.
You're behaving like someone who does.
Why wouldn't there be one giving him that power in the first place?
If he has the power to do whatever he wants with a certain % of the NBA's total revenue, there wouldn't need to be a clause specifically allowing him to fund the WNBA.
I'd say probably less than what you think.
It's irrelevant to this conversation, but I only really have interest in the business side of things.You're behaving like someone who does.
Same, it's not a boy/girl issue. If the NBA was the league being kept alive by the WNBA, I'd say shut the NBA down.
The comparison involves having a social agenda. But you already knew that.
It's a problem that's not on a radar for good reason. It's extremely low on the list of priorities because no matter what happens with the WNBA, it doesn't have a major impact on the NBA's financial model. $12 million (the most the NBA has had to cover in a season) is nothing to a multi-billion dollar revenue generating ins ution. Like I said, it's a drop in the bucket. If the WNBA continued to exist, it doesn't hurt the NBA much at all. If it's scrapped, it doesn't fix any of the economic problems it faces right now at the heart of the CBA negotiations.
I think the WNBA should be scrapped because I don't care about it. I don't watch it. I don't follow it. So I don't care about it. We can all agree that it does not profit the NBA so since I also don't follow it, I don't care. But even if it were scrapped, it would not help fix any of the economic problems the NBA has. So it's a problem that's not on the radar and doesn't need to be.
I think the money spent is a drop in the bucket compared to the whole of player salaries.
If that's true I'd ease up on my stance, but I still think the WNBA should go before the NBA starts contracting.
Not saying it's wrong, but could you post a link to the $12M figure, I'd be curious as to where one can find those numbers.
Where are BRHornet and sigz and all those s who jerk off to mediocre looking WNBA players at?
You finally learned about google. I'd like to introduce you to wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WNBA
Finance
So far the WNBA has not mirrored the monetary success of the NBA, though it targets profitability. While some teams do make a profit (and others break even), most of the teams in the WNBA lose money each season. Losses are subsidized by the NBA; in 2003, news surfaced that the NBA spent up to $12 million a year to help pay for the WNBA losses. In 2007, teams were estimated to be losing $1.5 million to $2 million a year.[12]
The crafty jew + quid-pro-quo chumpdumper=masterpiece theatre
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)