ugly ass gf. You must not have any shame
ugly ass gf. You must not have any shame
but you are still suggesting using at least two QBs every game.
and you even ted on it yourself.
you're still just stupid.You're just frustrated.
There there Blakey.
Football's played in innings???
great thread.
Sorry Fabbs, but I think xe M just wanted actual clarification that you understand the rules of football, because your BFF ducks once thought that Bird rights translated over to baseball. Since you two both possess the same mongoloid-level IQ, I think we all just want to make sure you understand that football isn't played in innings.
tbh this idea is almost as bad as Marty Mornhinweg's "choose to kick off at the start of OT" strategy.
The only way I could see this idea possibly working is with a star QB in the twilight of his career, and not as a "closer" but as a "2nd half QB" who could be more of a change of pace guy. One guy plays the first half, if the offense is stagnant, then you bring in a 38 year old Manning/Brady/etc in the 2nd half. And even that idea is ing stupid.
Mul rollsThere there multi's.Romo blew 20 pt leads twice in the 4th qtr, the 1st time in Cowboys history after leading that much in the 4th. But we think there is no better solution. We're not allowed to think out of our boxs. In fact we're not even supposed to clean our own boxes.
What happens if the reliever sucks too?
Also, do you have a lefty warming up in the bully if a righty cornerback is going single coverage on Austin?
Please spell out your game plan with specific details.
tbh Fabbs is only wondering if this will work so that hopefully Phyllis Rivers won't be on the field to choke away another playoff game. Just bring in a closer and the Chargers might actually have some playoff success.
I actually think this could be a good idea. However, the QB that you pull in the 4th would have to have the mental for ude of a guy you would want in the 4th quarter anyways because otherwise his confidence gets shot, as these QBs are often weak minded prima-donnas who can't handle being benched.
Better get in that late relief QB for Rivers I saiiiiiiidddd
Fabbs doesn't wanna go to the sidelines and talk to the ollllllllllllllllllllllll ball coach efter det one!
tbh a closer QB in San Diego is the perfect situation for one. Rivers is so incompetent at finishing games that he's exactly the guy Fabbs should have been talking about in this thread.
Remember the last great San Diego playoff win? Started by Rivers, finished by Billy Volek
Oh I'd love to talk to Norv after det one. You be wrong. Per usual.
Rivers in 4th. 21-17 lead. Outruns the untouched pass rusher and delivers a 36 yard strike to McMichael to bring the Bolts into Jet territory. 3rd and 4 on the 25. Chip shot field goal even if they don't make the 1st down. Vincent Jackson runs a little slant and Rivers hits him where? Oh yeah, on the hands. Bounces off Slacker Jacksons hands and worse yet he lets it bounce off his shoulder for a gift wrapped **interception** by Revis.
Yeah that's Rivers fault, what a choker. No doubt Wes Walker, Branch, etc etc would have also made such an idiotic play at that cruicial juncture when all that was needed was to not screw up.
The end of game botched two minute drill? (Actually 1:43). If that's on Rivers fine I'm sure he'll own up as will I. Why do i think Norvron was pulling the strings on that?
Yeah i remember the last winning Jets playoff game too.Remember the last great San Diego playoff win? Started by Rivers, finished by Billy Volek
You wanna talk about det one? You know since it's the same opponent.
And he failed. The End.
Brady can fail and fail and fail and he'll still have 3 rings.
Rivers can fail and fail and fail and he's still got nothing but failure on his resume.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)